how to consider sheet thickness in a simple extrusion

[MARCOO]

good morning to all, excuse me for the trivial question, building the extrusion as a figure settles the finite dimensions and the dimensions that will then be understood of the sheet thickness. This means that in the end the measures established initially in the extrusion are not respected but in some cases will be added by the sheet thickness (e.g. the measures 20 become 20+ thicker) .
Do you know if there is a method of redefining extrusion quotas after giving the thickness?
Thank you very much

 

[DANI-3D]

Hi.

a method can be used relationships, where you remove or add the thickness value, depending on the case, to the fold share.

 

[MARCOO]

I thought of this solution and it seemed " laborious" for simple pieces. I hope there is a system of "dimensional "correction" already at the level of definition of extrusion.... hope. . .
if someone knows thank you so much to all

 

[320i S]

in the sketch there is a command set-> tools feature->"often" (other than the "often" command present no main sketc card)
this from the possibility to immediately simulate the thickness and then put the fold quotas directly with the thickness.
the only menata (and I don't understand why they haven't fixed it yet) is that all bent rays in the sketch should be put before this command, and the beam of fold in the final mask will be ignored.

 

[MARCOO]

hi 320 is and thanks x your interest,
However with the command set-> tools feature->"often" it gives me "impossible to create offset entities - non-valid section".....

 

[320i S]

hi 320 is and thanks x your interest,
However with the command set-> tools feature->"often" it gives me "impossible to create offset entities - non-valid section".....

because you must first put all the bent rays and must be consistent with the thickness you want to give.

 

[MARCOO]

I tried with a simple piece like dis : but it doesn't go

 

[MARCOO]

Okay I try.

 

[MARCOO]

Thank you 320is,
It works... how to dis , but if you have to redefine the thickness e.g. switch from .8 to 1.2 you will have to redefine all the rays....

 

[320i S]

if in the sketch you bind them between them and then you control them with an off sketch relationship, you don't have to review anything.

personally in first design I put all the minimum rays = thickness, then once chosen the supplier, if it has special needs that can not rework the project with its standards, I sell it.