• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

how to draw geodetic structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter doking
  • Start date Start date

doking

Guest
Good evening
for exercise I should draw a geodetic structures:eek:
do you have any info or suggestions on how to draw them?
of course thanks in advance :finger:
 
Good evening
for exercise I should draw a geodetic structures:eek:
do you have any info or suggestions on how to draw them?
of course thanks in advance :finger:
I guess it's about the university wrong doking?:biggrin:

you need in autocad or solidworks, so I'll prepare you some material at least for a starting point:biggrin:
In the meantime, give an eye.click hereLet me know.
 
I was hoping for your intervention:

I have available both cads but are more comfortable in autocad,
the link you've already seen me but I create it is not useful to me, I attach you something I threw down, they have all the same sides but also making the edges coincide and making a series is not satisfactory
 

Attachments

I was hoping for your intervention:

I have available both cads but are more comfortable in autocad,
the link you've already seen me but I create it is not useful to me, I attach you something I threw down, they have all the same sides but also making the edges coincide and making a series is not satisfactory
but what is that:hahahahah: a scarabocchio?
I put the files in both autocad and solidworks, I hope you might have been helpful.
Let me know bucket:biggrin:
View attachment Strutture Geodetiche.rarI forgot but do you use autocad 2004?
update:wink:
 
I'm smuggling and you're having fun. ? ?
I use 2013 but save in 2004 :biggrin:

interesting savior, very:finger:
How about you give me some tips so I look good??? :biggrin:

solidworks 2012 sp4 some fil does not open the files, I see only the preview of the files
 
in any case saver the thing that most cares about me is learning the process and understanding how to calculate the size
 
in any case saver the thing that most cares about me is learning the process and understanding how to calculate the size
but doking excuses use the quota command or since they are faces/solids/regions use the foreign command edges so that you can delete everything you don't need as surfaces and solids so you only have reference lines. :wink:
strange that those in solidworks do not open, as soon as I have some time I reconvert them to you in other format.
I don't do it now because I should change the operating system.
You can also import them on autocad to me it works.
so you get all the odds you need as reference measures.
 
but doking excuses use the quota command or since they are faces/solids/regions use the foreign command edges so that you can delete everything you don't need as surfaces and solids so you only have reference lines. :wink:
strange that those in solidworks do not open, as soon as I have some time I reconvert them to you in other format.
I don't do it now because I should change the operating system.
You can also import them on autocad to me it works.
so you get all the odds you need as reference measures.
Of course I can extract, copy and paste, could I even scale at this point or not?

But I was wondering if there was a rule to follow, my thought was to put it in practice something of mine!
in any case tomorrow I will try to understand something more, of course every advice and I accept :biggrin:
 
prova with questa! :smile:
 

Attachments

  • Loch_Ness_Wellington_(226386778).webp
    Loch_Ness_Wellington_(226386778).webp
    733.3 KB · Views: 27
Who explains what a geodetic structure is?
I understand the mathematical concept of geodesia... but structurally what features does it have?
 
Who explains what a geodetic structure is?
I understand the mathematical concept of geodesia... but structurally what features does it have?
the characteristics of a geodetic form is simply for its robustness.
geodetics intersect by forming triangular elements more or less similar, varying according to their shape if spherical or not.
triangles are all very similar to each other and being so rigid in this way distribute the efforts to the whole structure unlike a formed type a brick wall.
We make example of a geodetic dome, not and said that a larger dome is less robust than a small dome, they are as strong as they are larger.
 
the characteristics of a geodetic form is simply for its robustness.
geodetics intersect by forming triangular elements more or less similar, varying according to their shape if spherical or not.
triangles are all very similar to each other and being so rigid in this way distribute the efforts to the whole structure unlike a formed type a brick wall.
We make example of a geodetic dome, not and said that a larger dome is less robust than a small dome, they are as strong as they are larger.
I would say that you can realize the triangles that make it all similar to each other to have a faster production. in this case I got 2-size triangles, but I think we can have the triangles all the same
 

Attachments

the characteristics of a geodetic form is simply for its robustness.
geodetics intersect by forming triangular elements more or less similar, varying according to their shape if spherical or not.
triangles are all very similar to each other and being so rigid in this way distribute the efforts to the whole structure unlike a formed type a brick wall.
We make example of a geodetic dome, not and said that a larger dome is less robust than a small dome, they are as strong as they are larger.
a bit of Italian language crafted and some concept a little more technical and in-depth ?
 
a bit of Italian language crafted and some concept a little more technical and in-depth ?
should you first explain what an Italian language is crafted, iron or aluminium? ?
we can make languages of all kinds, materials and colors!!
:biggrin:
 
should you first explain what an Italian language is crafted, iron or aluminium? ?
we can make languages of all kinds, materials and colors!!
:biggrin:
just read the first sentence of what I quoted to realize what is not.
 
It's my limit, I'm struggling with people who ignore grammar, lexicon and syntax.
are the first things that teach us and if we do not know those, let alone calculation for a geodetic structure.
many chains with the pc... very few designers worthy of such qualification.
 
written in a hurry.:biggrin:
maxopus if we look at all grammatical errors etc. to everything we write then we do not go out.
It is not a question of grammar.
If I ask an engineer "why is the triangle resistant?", this can answer me in two ways:
1. because the triangular shape distributes well efforts, increasing in this way its rigidity

2. because a triangle-cerniera loads its structure with only normal efforts, while generally managing to convey a multiaxial effort. therefore the triangles are dimensioned so as not to undergo peak load, the whole structure is calculated considering a single type of effort. attention however, because the triangle-incastro does not work like this, and while appearing more rigid, it is actually less durable.

You can notice that answer 1. I can wait for my daughter while on answer 2. you can start making a little more professional reasoning.

Your answer looks so troublingly like 1.

Moreover, a geodetic structure would be a "triangoli" structure and just? the fact that each side is the rope of an orthodrome has no structural effect? Is there a structure "to triangles" whose sides do not insist on orthodromes? so leather I would say no...but considering the time I could say nonsense.
you can also write that you are of papuasia, so much pasta that you open your mouth just pet breathing to realize when you are terroni
I'm missing something?
What does this post mean?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top