i believe nx

[Mauri:66]

Bye to all,
probably we will pass to nx for new customer needs, some of you can kindly tell me how much it takes to become operational in modeling knowing and working already with solidworks / catia v5 / creo 2.0...
I just need to know if the passage is sweet or not.

Thank you

 

[ceschi1959]

Bye to all,
probably we will pass to nx for new customer needs, some of you can kindly tell me how much it takes to become operational in modeling knowing and working already with solidworks / catia v5 / creo 2.0...
I just need to know if the passage is sweet or not.

Thank you

depends on how much the customer uses the software and that is if it is a historical user then it takes us as you have to completely enter the logic of nx that is very different from that of other cad, if instead the customer is not a historical user you just need less.

Maybe contact me in mp that we talk about it.

Hi.

 

[Mauri:66]

thanks baskets 1959, at the moment we are in embryonic phase with this customer so if there were to be future developments and need, I will not fail to make myself alive.

 

[The_Matrix]

Leaving the specificity of the customer, to learn the part of modeling, assembly and 2d, using the methodology you already know, I said, learn enough to be able to handle it, if you have a good teacher 5-8 days, depends on the complexity of the models you have to realize.

 

[IPdesign]

by direct experience depends on how attached to the previous cad :wink: .
Often in my courses happen phenomena that would like to use nx as they used proes / casket / creo etc..
when meeting certain people the role of the tutor becomes somewhat more difficult.
It is often overwhelmed by the choices of those who have decided to change the system.
Fortunately, people also meet who have a very positive approach and put themselves in the optimal condition of "capire" .

Basically, the foundations should be in the first line "I understand how reason nx" and then "I take the necessary commands to start moving "; for running it needs some experience but you always get there .

so if I can advise you on an approach, try to eliminate your certainties on how others work and enjoy the training you will have to do without prejudice.

Obviously there will be things that will seem more Moroccan in appearance but in the end, when you will understand how nx works you will also understand why .

 

[Mauri:66]

thanks to all of the answers,
to the base remains the fact of keeping a mind ready and flexible, that you can always question what until today seemed the only way to get to the purpose...

mauri:66

 

[The_Matrix]

thanks to all of the answers,
to the base remains the fact of keeping a mind ready and flexible, that you can always question what until today seemed the only way to get to the purpose...

mauri:66

You know mauri,
the greater difficulty of nx is the fact that it always has 3/4 ways to do the same thing.
if you are to the standard parametric mode that has now been consolidated:
- I create a sketch in the "task environment"
- use the sketch to create the feature
- I use the show/hide commands to view/hide the geometry generated by the features
- assembly with constraint assembly
... and I let go of the most "particular" things of nx:
- the layers
- the reference sets
- the possibility to reuse sketches
- explicit lines
- sketches directed outside the task environment
- the st
- etc...
You will see that you learn it in an amen...
I hope for you that you will use a recent version (nx8.5 or, better yet, nx9). the versions first on certain aspects (pattern so much to tell you one) are a bit ostical.
if you can use the nx9 is better because it has the ribbon user interface so you don't have to return it.

... then, of course... if you make very "freeform" models then change everything. because every cad has its own peculiarities because the forms are peculiar to itself.