i recommend a attached section.

[Karmiof]

hello to all, I was assigned this exercise. It's a simple set, which should be designed mounted and in section. the exercise presents itself in isometry with two sections on two completely different planes, choosing only one of those for the execution of the design would mean hiding from one or other point of view of the very important details. choosing the axis drawn from the holes of the clamps would remove visibility to the structure of the tree and vice versa.
I would like some advice from you on which section plan to choose.
thanks in advance :smile:

 

[meccanicamg]

can be very well a view in section that takes into account the "sfalzata" so it will be dissected a little in one plan and a little in the other

 

[Karmiof]

the section must be represented by the European method and from one view it would not make sense if it was flawed above all because it would talk about a rise with an angle of 90 degrees. then the choice falls on a section plan!

 

[meccanicamg]

the section must be represented by the European method and from one view it would not make sense if it was flawed above all because it would talk about a rise with an angle of 90 degrees. then the choice falls on a section plan!

I read what's on the sheet:

make 1 representation mounted with all edges in sight
make 1 representation in section

I repeat the sections you do where you need them in the mounted axieme, then also thrives of 90°, localized etc etc. etc.
if you have to do the views (which you don't understand from the text even if you can guess) you can still do the sections where you need, partial, localized, whole and numbed in any case

 

[Karmiof]

I read what's on the sheet:

make 1 representation mounted with all edges in sight
make 1 representation in section

I repeat the sections you do where you need them in the mounted axieme, then also thrives of 90°, localized etc etc. etc.
if you have to do the views (which you don't understand from the text even if you can guess) you can still do the sections where you need, partial, localized, whole and numbed in any case

the design should not be made in isometry, but according to a view. I had thought about making partial sections, but the text (and the professor too) is not very clear and it seems that the section should be integral and I was wondering if there was so much choice... Anyway thank you very much for the advice :smile: