• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

i sell license siemens nx

  • Thread starter Thread starter ceschi1959
  • Start date Start date

ceschi1959

Guest
Good morning to all,

Since I changed work, I sell mach3 nx 13300n license at a very interesting price.

if interested contact me in mp.
 
Good morning to all,

Since I changed work, I sell mach3 nx 13300n license at a very interesting price.

if interested contact me in mp.
I just learned from the dealer who had informed me about the possibility of selling the license according to a sentence, that if that is possible, siemens not to lose business, does not renew these licenses.
In the first place I apologize with everyone for giving an information that, if on the one hand it is correct, on the other it makes almost impossible its realization.

greetings to all
 
I just learned from the dealer who had informed me about the possibility of selling the license according to a sentence, that if that is possible, siemens not to lose business, does not renew these licenses.
In the first place I apologize with everyone for giving an information that, if on the one hand it is correct, on the other it makes almost impossible its realization.
I'm sorry.
thanks for the information. It would seem like a first step to protect customers once in a while.
It is only necessary to wait for the next sentence in which it is declared unlawful in conduct of siemens (or any other software house) not to renew the license in advance, as if the new buyer had already committed violations of the license agreement that would justify its revocation.

So much for curiosity, do you have the extremes of that sentence?
 
thanks for the information. It would seem like a first step to protect customers once in a while.
It is only necessary to wait for the next sentence in which it is declared unlawful in conduct of siemens (or any other software house) not to renew the license in advance, as if the new buyer had already committed violations of the license agreement that would justify its revocation.

So much for curiosity, do you have the extremes of that sentence?
find everything here
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/software_usatoFor the specific case siemens had given me the procedure for certain, sale license I mean, and I had already prepared the documentation that the same siemens had provided me. I then come to know that they do not renew the maintenance for which I have a 'dead' license. I really find a vigliaccata worthy of the typical Italian cavillisms.
 
find everything here
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/software_usatoFor the specific case siemens had given me the procedure for certain, sale license I mean, and I had already prepared the documentation that the same siemens had provided me. I then come to know that they do not renew the maintenance for which I have a 'dead' license. I really find a vigliaccata worthy of the typical Italian cavillisms.
As I said, it is the next sentence, based on a case like yours and that of the potential buyer of your license that you see denied the right to assistance.
 
at this point may also be interesting this site:http://resoft.it/I have not deepened the vision, I limit myself to report it, if someone wants to deepen and report a feedback .........

p.s.
I find that this site is not the only one
 
I bought a lot of used software, both from this site:https://www.usedsoft-shop.com/it/home/both buying them from companies and communicating the purchase to the software house.
It seems to me that in addition to allowing the passage the company must also guarantee the updates. even if there are companies like solidworks to which I failed to accept the passage of the used.
They also told me that they could not avoid passing licenses, but that they would never provide support and update. by pointing out that the European Court of Justice has heard differently, I have been told that the licenses are in the hands of American management and that they do not admit it.
I would have liked to buy, feel like I couldn't update and sue, but I didn't have the financial capacity.
 
if there are companies like the solidworks to which I couldn't accept the passage of the use.
They also told me that they could not avoid passing licenses, but that they would never provide support and update. by pointing out that the European Court of Justice has heard differently, I have been told that the licenses are in the hands of American management and that they do not admit it.
It would be interesting to understand how it is possible that a decision of the European Court of Justice for violations obviously carried out in Europe could be ignored by a company operating in Europe.
apart from the factual extraterritoriality of the armed forces use that they do what I want everywhere (cermis docet) I don't think that a company, as far as stars and striscies, can beat the feet more than ever. microsoft already took her to that place once. who knows that the next are not the wings of the cad...
I would have liked to buy, feel like I couldn't update and sue, but I didn't have the financial capacity.
.

but sooner or later they find it someone who has time and money to use to make him the hut butt that sti banditi in jacket and tie deserve.
 
a few years ago, I sold to my client a cad/cam that I did not use, I made a request for key replacement that passed to my client who then continued with updates.
all without problems (the software is American)
Good day
 
Good morning to all,

Since I changed work, I sell mach3 nx 13300n license at a very interesting price.

if interested contact me in mp.
Hello, I know it's been a while, you still have a license? in case you can contact me at 347 7524229
 
_ have there been updates/freedoms regarding the obligation for software houses to provide assistance on legitimately sold licenses?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top