ideution

[SiEM]

I found out with interest this technology... at the hobbistic level I delight in the tuning (art of customization of the car). .

Seeing this technology, I've had a lot of ideas...

in the tuning, for example in the customization of the doors, the procedure is to realize a structure, use a cloth to cover of fiberglass, sanding, etc...

being completely ignorant, would it be possible to make the model with the cad, realize 3d printing through a company and mount everything?

What resistance does the material have? Maximum dimensions? is the finished product smooth or "pixellate"? orientally the costs to how far they go for printing a model?

thanks to anyone who wants to answer me and apologize if I said or thought of chestnuts! :smile:

ps: good year to all!! !

 

[Fulvio Romano]

probably if you have to work fiberglass, maybe it is better to make wooden chairs to cover with the above cloth. a 3d printing, besides costing a lot if of the size of a door, is also unnecessarily heavy.

 

[IPdesign]

Hello

Your hobby has always attracted me and I don't hide that I even did something.

the speech is very vast and articulated and I would not write a poem .

In principle you can do everything, starting from reverse engineering to import the geometry to change "tuning" , model the component to cad and then switch to the prototype .

here the choice of technology needs to be done according to what you need
If you want to make a mold to make multiples of fiberglass then maybe an economical print in chalk or starch is fine
if you want in functional piece like a support for a dashboard monitor then you should stay on abs that is workable with sanding and painting.

size - you can stand on the standard within 200/250mm or even reach 400mm or even 900 but obviously more you climb in size and more machines to make such objects become difficult to find and therefore expensive.

prices - prepared at the point of view , you will hardly be able to stand on small figures, if not for small objects, some techniques benefit from a reduction of costs on a discreet number of pieces but the tuning for itself has value only if it is "only"

If you want, without obligation, call me, I always gladly compare with those who have ideas and want to do

Palo

 

[SiEM]

In principle you can do everything, starting from reverse engineering to import the geometry to change "tuning" , model the component to cad and then switch to the prototype .

That's the idea! it would be beautiful, especially because with 2 clicks you created the custom piece. . .

here the choice of technology needs to be done according to what you need
If you want to make a mold to make multiples of fiberglass then maybe an economical print in chalk or starch is fine
if you want in functional piece like a support for a dashboard monitor then you should stay on abs that is workable with sanding and painting.

this is also a very used technique, for example for bumpers a mold is created and filled with fiber sheets of glass and resin. and 95% of the work so is done.. .

size - you can stand on the standard within 200/250mm or even reach 400mm or even 900 but obviously more you climb in size and more machines to make such objects become difficult to find and therefore expensive.

This seems like a problem... If it's a question of editing a piece of the dashboard like a bocchetta, I don't think there's any problem... but the heavier changes do not think at this point, unless creating the mold in 4 pieces.

prices - prepared at the point of view , you will hardly be able to stand on small figures, if not for small objects, some techniques benefit from a reduction of costs on a discreet number of pieces but the tuning for itself has value only if it is "only"

Many customizations already cost a lot, for example to realize a couple of doors the prices are around 500-1000 euros...

 

[IPdesign]

That's the idea! it would be beautiful, especially because with 2 clicks you created the custom piece. . .

Well 2 clicks is a way of saying, actually there is a lot to work :biggrin:

the discourse moulded in chalk instead I thought also with the idea of creating 4/5 pieces, thus damming with a small series the cost.

for the dimensional discourse, if it is a mold you can safely make more pieces and assemble it for the writing of fiberglass; if instead we talk about components with large dimensions can still be made in several pieces, assembled and painted.
of course every need is history itself.

on the cost speech, if what you say is the cost of a couple of doors, I think that probably with the prototypes we are far beyond that figure.

but I repeat, if instead of making a mold for only 2 goalkeepers do it and realize 6, of course you spoil the shopping.
:wink:

 

[Sasso SP]

Bye to all,
by experience the problem of making I have plaster mold and that to have a smooth surface to spread the fabrics and have a good result you have to distract really a lot!!!

 

[flaviobrio88]

What is "tuning"?

Can you explain to who doesn't know what this is about?

editato:
I'm sorry. I got it better.