imparare autocad with method

[cadland]

hi to everyone, I would like to learn to use autocad mainly for drawing 2d, at least to start (civil field more than industrial, but at this level probably there is not too much difference of approach).

despite having an infarination on the instrument that dates back to years ago (on a version of autocad that I think was 2004), I would like more than to learn to use it "by method", perhaps with some application to drawings to be copied or projects to reason on. I don't know if I explained: an account is knowing the basic functions, another is to apply them effectively to real cases or in any case practical applications.

on the thread of this question I would ask you if it can help, if it is strongly advised or perhaps indispensable to support a text and in case I would ask you a advice on what title to consider, better if available online type in pdf.

I have seen that youtube also hosts some series of videos that seem great to me to understand the basic functions. I'm following them, but I'd like to look into the application.

Thank you in advance! :

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

on the forum there are several listed drawings from which to start (the section is that of students where it is easier to find exercises developed)
the subject was also already treated https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/ricerca-esercizi-autocad-2d-di-base.53757/you can also write in google learn autocad to see a world of good

 

[liber]

autocad for 2d from the 2004 version (and also in the previous ones) until the 2019 version beyond the menu shift, icons, and some help snap to video remained such and which.

 

[Tristan]

autocad for 2d from the 2004 version (and also in the previous ones) until the 2019 version beyond the menu shift, icons, and some help snap to video remained such and which.

In short... 2004 did not have dynamic blocks, annotation scales, multidirectors, mtesti available in column and many other so that those who know how to use autocad can not do without. then if we talk about pulling lines, then I give you reason

 

[cadland]

In the meantime, thanks for the answers!
the reference to autocad 2004 was to say that I referred to "years ago" and that even my infarination dates back to those years, perhaps something more recently, but it is still too long. I mean, let's just say that I'm leaving not from scratch but almost...

I can do a bit of practice by copying tables, but what I wanted to ask in my question was more than another method to use the software so much more effective.
to understand the table to be copied only tells me how it must be the final result, but it does not tell me anything about what practical procedure to take to get there, and it is not just... It is likely to make the difference between completing the table in half an hour working with method, rather than in 2 hours going "to feeling".

from here my reference to online documentation (possible free). but even if you think so, some advice on a text that may seem very useful to you to approach autocad in the best way.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

There is no better method and there is no book that tells you that you use commands to do so. to be fast you just have to practice

 

[PlannerRoad]

In short... 2004 did not have dynamic blocks, annotation scales, multidirectors, mtesti available in column and many other so that those who know how to use autocad can not do without. then if we talk about pulling lines, then I give you reason

Yes, the evolution has certainly been, and all that has been inserted over time has become an indispensable use for those who use autocad not only to pull two lines. but we talk about 14/15 years of difference, once biblical in the IT field. If we consider past years and what has been implemented, we can almost say that it remained firm in its development.

 

[Tristan]

If we consider past years and what has been implemented, we can almost say that it remained firm in its development.

You know what's really stuck? engine development. that is a problem, especially for verticalizations that still use autocad (architecture, civil 3d, mep etc.).

 

[liber]

my answer was in function of the 2004 version, obvious must start from what you know, apply and as you discover the rest of the news and implementations, and how you assertmammals you have to become fast, there is no better method than another