info price scanner 3d

[volaff]

hi to all, I would need a price indication regarding the scanner below:
do you think there is something alternative but equally valid in terms of performance?

I'm a 3d scanner neophyte.
Thank you all anyway.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

artec is a market reference. Surely there are other products, probably cheaper, but I wouldn't risk my money for products with approximate assistance. then remain to see the needs of the customer.

 

[volaff]

Hello thanks for the answer.
Perhaps with an example I can make better understand.
in the company where we produce seats for buses and trains.
the property would like to buy this type of scanner for the acquisition of seat geometry (in frame terms, padding, structural parts etc.).

according to you such scanner could satisfy this requirement without going on much more expensive products?
Your opinion would support me.
Thank you very much

 

[Vittorio]

scanner 3dThis is professional.. and also have software to transform detection into surfaces
I know them for dimensional control systems .. and I saw in the last bimu this "game"
They took my hand and within a few minutes I had the 3d model

 

[volaff]

Bye.
on the professional scanner honestly I had few doubts in the sense that I imagine how reliable and useful it can be.

my attention was more to understand if an economic model, like the one above, is able to acquire relatively large object as a passenger seat and with what accuracy.
Obviously there is always the possibility of a demonstration in place but having info before it is always useful to avoid misunderstandings.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

Hello thanks for the answer.
Perhaps with an example I can make better understand.
in the company where we produce seats for buses and trains.
the property would like to buy this type of scanner for the acquisition of seat geometry (in frame terms, padding, structural parts etc.).

according to you such scanner could satisfy this requirement without going on much more expensive products?
Your opinion would support me.
Thank you very much

I have always had a doubt about this type of scanner: about objects that need to be scanned around us, what kind of precision do they have on the overall form? If I walk around a round column, can the scan come out oval?
I honestly saw laser devices mounted on arm that might work better, but costs rise. . .

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

hi to all, I would need a price indication regarding the scanner below:
View attachment 62432do you think there is something alternative but equally valid in terms of performance?

I'm a 3d scanner neophyte.
Thank you all anyway.

back to the point, I remembered this:

 

[Onda]

hi to all, I would need a price indication regarding the scanner below:
View attachment 62432do you think there is something alternative but equally valid in terms of performance?

I'm a 3d scanner neophyte.
Thank you all anyway.

I have this scanner, and for a seat, in my opinion it can be okay. as precision you are something under the millimeter, 0.5 - 0.7 obviously not good for precision mechanics objects, but for a seat I think it can go. I use it to detect composite geometries on which then create molds for couplings.. I'm fine. simple software

 

[volaff]

Thank you very much for the feedback.

I think you only detect surfaces and then move to the solid model you should use a cad.
correct?

Thank you so much!

 

[Onda]

the rilevo creates a cloud of points, then after processing you get to a stl, from here, with patience and imagination, you go to a model with surfaces, which then maybe close in a solid.
to do all this at least two software.
If you've got to spend, geomagic, otherwise you're going to do something like rhinoceros.

 

[volaff]

Thank you very much for your precision.
You were really nice.

 

[volaff]

However, we asked for a free demo to verify that the scanner is suitable for detecting parts of a passenger seat.

how much I understand the output of the scanner will be a cloud of points that, through another software (geomagic - catia - ect), must be manipulated to get surfaces and with so much patience, in the end, a solid?
Is the iter correct?

Thank you very much for the time you have dedicated to me.

 

[Vittorio]

well informed about what it means cloud of points and so much patience. .it is true that it definitely has different costs than I had suggested to you hexagon m&h
I saw it at work and after scanning the object I saw the solid model within a few minutes.
Then it's all done in the fairs to impress.

 

[volaff]

Thank you very much for the tip.
I'll definitely tell who's taller up in me.

:

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

how much I understand the output of the scanner will be a cloud of points that, through another software (geomagic - catia - ect), must be manipulated to get surfaces and with so much patience, in the end, a solid?
Is the iter correct?

Yes, but no. It could also be that your prototype is simply a reference to the maximum, so it could be enough to overlay the cloud of points to your modeling so that it can regain its size and proportions.