insert quotas and constraints

[ForFlight]

I attach a pdf where there are represented quotas and constraints to be applied in the sketch (as per figure), there arises the doubt , but the representation of the constraints to be entered as you see, is to mean horizontal, vertical and intersection (then purpose of the exercise), or go back to a previous release of inventor? and I would like to know if the three constraints mentioned above correspond to those displayed! Thank you so much to all!

 

[sampom]

I attach a pdf where there are represented quotas and constraints to be applied in the sketch (as per figure), there arises the doubt , but the representation of the constraints to be entered as you see, is to mean horizontal, vertical and intersection (then purpose of the exercise), or go back to a previous release of inventor? and I would like to know if the three constraints mentioned above correspond to those displayed! Thank you so much to all!

Forgive me. .
but that is a sketch of solidworks (can you use this? .... What are you doing here?

However, yes, I am horizontal, vertical and coincident (what you call intersection).

greetings
Marco

 

[Tequila]

I attach a pdf where there are represented quotas and constraints to be applied in the sketch (as per figure), there arises the doubt , but the representation of the constraints to be entered as you see, is to mean horizontal, vertical and intersection (then purpose of the exercise), or go back to a previous release of inventor? and I would like to know if the three constraints mentioned above correspond to those displayed! Thank you so much to all!

Try to watch some tutorials on the internet http://www.5min.com/video/how-to-sketch-in-autodesk-inventor-2011-299991827but where do you work which cad used? Have you done a course or are you self-taught?

 

[ForFlight]

Forgive me. .
but that is a sketch of solidworks (can you use this? .... What are you doing here?

However, yes, I am horizontal, vertical and coincident (what you call intersection).

greetings
Marco

Thank you for your clarity! no use solidworks! Thanks again.

 

[ForFlight]

Try to watch some tutorials on the internet http://www.5min.com/video/how-to-sketch-in-autodesk-inventor-2011-299991827

in the tutorial (to thank your help), the bonds are made based on construction lines and so far it is all clear, but if I had to remake the sketch that I posted in pdf (developed with solidworks) with inventor, should I create construction line to apply the bond? as you can see in the figure of the sketch, on the lower left you notice the coinciding bond and continuing in anticlockwise direction, the horizontal bond, coinciding bond, still coincidence, after vertical etc.! are I don't see construction line! in this case, to insert the constraints well, what procedure should you use with inventor? Thank you!

 

[sampom]

in the tutorial (to thank your help), the bonds are made based on construction lines and so far it is all clear, but if I had to remake the sketch that I posted in pdf (developed with solidworks) with inventor, should I create construction line to apply the bond? as you can see in the figure of the sketch, on the lower left you notice the coinciding bond and continuing in anticlockwise direction, the horizontal bond, coinciding bond, still coincidence, after vertical etc.! are I don't see construction line! in this case, to insert the constraints well, what procedure should you use with inventor? Thank you!

in that case the "building lines" have nothing to do with it and do not do (in fact as you noticed there are no). simply as you "draw" the sketch lines those basic simple constraints are added automatically; the system "understands" that you are making a horizontal or vertical line or that you are joining points together (for the coincidental). in fact during the tracking the constraints are proposed and displayed, going forward if you take them yourself. then you just have to quote and place compared to the origin to have the sketch completely defined with all black lines (and what you posted is not, there are no quotas. As you can see, there are still blue lines.
in the lower corners, both at the right and at the left, were added axes (probably it is a long one that remains covered by the thick line) "building" in mixed line; That's why there's a coincidence with the squirrels.
that is the sketch for the revolution of a tree, the axis drawn point would serve as a rotation axis but it is not necessary, you can use the same horizontal low line. But the axes allow you to quote already in the sketch as a diameter (as seen from the example).

all this referring to solidworks, for inventor I don't know but I think you didn't differ much (but weren't you the inventor's expert? ? ).

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[ForFlight]

in that case the "building lines" have nothing to do with it and do not do (in fact as you noticed there are no). simply as you "draw" the sketch lines those basic simple constraints are added automatically; the system "understands" that you are making a horizontal or vertical line or that you are joining points together (for the coincidental). in fact during the tracking the constraints are proposed and displayed, going forward if you take them yourself. then you just have to quote and place compared to the origin to have the sketch completely defined with all black lines (and what you posted is not, there are no quotas. As you can see, there are still blue lines.
in the lower corners, both at the right and at the left, were added axes (probably it is a long one that remains covered by the thick line) "building" in mixed line; That's why there's a coincidence with the squirrels.
that is the sketch for the revolution of a tree, the axis drawn point would serve as a rotation axis but it is not necessary, you can use the same horizontal low line. But the axes allow you to quote already in the sketch as a diameter (as seen from the example).

all this referring to solidworks, for inventor I don't know but I think you didn't differ much (but weren't you the inventor's expert? ? ).

greetings
Marco:smile:

first I have to thank you for the explanations given (they are more than clear)! for inventor works in the same way, the difference lies in the color of the lines after bound, as you said in solidworks are black while in inventor are blue color! I still have some doubts about those constraints of coincidence, but not how they fit, but why use them? According to you, that axis covered by the line that generates the points of coincidence, is it really necessary? Can you not put yourself to make a correct design? Thank you so much! I don't think I said I was a top gun of inventor!

 

[sampom]

I still have some doubts about those constraints of coincidence, but not how they fit, but why use them?

because they tell you that those dots/sprays have to stay on that line.
But I repeat that they automatically insert themselves as you approach the cursor to the line.

According to you, that axis covered by the line that generates the points of coincidence, is it really necessary? Can you not put yourself to make a correct design?

I just told you:

that is the sketch for the revolution of a tree, the axis drawn point would serve as a rotating axis but not necessary, you can use the same horizontal low line. But the axes allow you to quote already in the sketch as a diameter (as seen from the example).

Hello
marco

 

[ForFlight]

because they tell you that those dots/sprays have to stay on that line.
But I repeat that they automatically insert themselves as you approach the cursor to the line.


I just told you:
greetings
Mar

grazie sampom!:finger: