installation sequence table

[reggio]

hi, let's say we have a total mounted and want to show with the putting into the table the assembly / disassembly sequences, therefore the same orthogonal view repeated several times one under the other where in each view one or more particular disappears until the end of the pieces.
As I predict future variations I would like to keep everything already placed in column so that at every variation I would already find the ready mounting scheme to export in autocad...

I was thinking about using configurations, but then how do I put the views of the various configurations on the table?

 

[meccanicamg]

you can use configurations in the axieme. then take a look at the table and copy and paste. then in each view click with the right button, click on property and in the screen that comes out you go to select the configuration in the "use the configuration by name".


other thing, unique configuration, then from the table you select the components, right button, show hide... Hide component.

 

[reggio]

you can use configurations in the axieme. then take a look at the table and copy and paste. then in each view click with the right button, click on property and in the screen that comes out you go to select the configuration in the "use the configuration by name".


other thing, unique configuration, then from the table you select the components, right button, show hide... Hide component.

You're right, the 1st with configurations I could use it if I had to get more views for every "pezzo" table: I hide the part in the configured axieme and immediately each relative view hides the part.

for now instead, since I foresee a single view for each step I use the 2nd method, without config.

thank you so much for the excellent suggestion!

 

[marcof]

for now instead, since I foresee a single view for each step I use the 2nd method, without config.

you predict, but then wrong forecast and you want to put an isometric view or a side view and you're beautiful that fucked:
I would never use the exhibition hide but do the config of the witness recalled at the table.

 

[meccanicamg]

you predict, but then wrong forecast and you want to put an isometric view or a side view and you're beautiful that fucked:
I would never use the exhibition hide but do the config of the witness recalled at the table.

I fully agree. the use of configurations I would say that it is the most rational and flexible. the other system we say that it is fast but not flexible and it is good for little stuff very simple. always better at this point build models together with correct concepts, example:

together explosive parallel lathe containing configurable spindle head subaxis. you do the explosive of all the main axieme, then you make a view of the configuration of the head to highlight the variants.

 

[reggio]

... well then I configuro! :biggrin:
thanks to all

 

[reggio]

But...

But maybe I'll have another problem to solve. . .
I now configuro, posiziono l'assieme rotated it as more aggressive and insert the view at the table dragging "*current" i want to see the view as I put it in the 3d axieme,
Now I make copies and change the configurations, so all right, the views are all "angular" in the same way.

Now we try to think about inserting a new part into the axieme and that to view it well in the tav put should rotate the views: Do I have to do it again or can I update in qlc mode?

 

[maca75]

perhaps you should also save yourself a view with name, canoe icon; because with current if you turn the view and reopen the design the views inserted as current should be updated with the new orientation.
maybe what you want to do you can do even by saving n views, but maybe it's easier to manage everything with configurations and maybe with an excel tabellina
Hi.

 

[Fremposta]

Good morning to all:
I would use visualization states also because both at the table and in 3d you can switch from one to another very fast. or a couple of configurations (when needed e.g. different explosive) display states.
general considerations:
They are both very dangerous as I think they are not yet granitic in their stability.

 

[Oldwarper]

I can confirm the problems of configurations and display states. If they are few and for a few details, then you can go. but if as in my case there is a mold with 18 different configurations (and parts that have different configurations within them, all related and interdependent each other), prepared for a blood bath.

better display states, less flexible but more stable lately. but sometimes problems with cosmetic threads.

 

[reggio]

uhmmm want to explain more to me about the "viewing sites"?
Where do I leave?

 

[Fremposta]

uhmmm want to explain more to me about the "viewing sites"?
Where do I leave?

It would take a small course... but I don't do that anymore.
Tonight I see if I can prepare you an example... and post it bye

 

[meccanicamg]

uhmmm want to explain more to me about the "viewing sites"?
Where do I leave?

read the guide first. then for display states I would say that it is quite explicit what is written in the property window.
...choose configurations
...if you've done an explosive view you can activate it
...