inventor 2010 - threads

[Tarkus]

even whitworth does not match the characteristics you indicated.
in the table uni 2709 and in the standard british the number of threads per inch does not correspond (from 7 to 9).

According to me it is a custom thread that has no correspondence with the threads provided by these norms.

Right.
nothing prohibits applying a filet that does not fall into legislation.
If I want to do, because for a variety of reasons I think it confaces, a thread 1.25 on a diameter 80, I can do it, it is clear that that thread will not be classified (I understand neither, but,mb,mc, etc) in no metric norm table and therefore inventor does not apply it, unless you go to dismantle in
.xls file of threads. . .

 

[vale79]

Yeah, you're right. we will see how many times we fall, if it is so common in this field perhaps it is better to add this 'standard' to inventor, others so much it is worth drawing the correct diameter to then change brutally the annotation, so much if you do not go a split view the profile of the teeth you do not see and a thread is worth the other (changes' also the height of the thread but I do not think that someone will go to measure it if the notes are sufficiently clear and possibly
:
super thanks to all
That's right.