inventor courses

[gil]

Hello
I am looking for introductory courses to autodesk inventor at a decent price.

if the course is intensive, 2-3 days the place does not matter, I move.
if it is extensive it is necessary both in my parts, Romagna.

would you tell me to do someone who offers this service?

Thank you.

 

[davide75]

Where? ?

cmq if you look at there are the vocational training centers that do them and if you can take advantage of certain vauchers the price is low.cmq I recommend you use the pruners guide because I nventor I learned it myself following the guide and then as you work it you learn it. then if you look in the forum you will find many differences regarding different topics that will explain to you any things you don't understand.

 

[gil]

Yes, I've seen that there are many courses, but I'm afraid there are also a lot of sneaky.

the majority of training centers, is not certified autodesk, do not issue a certification or certified certificate. There are no information about who keeps the course and at least in some cases even the teacher has a certification.

At this point, even I could go straight to the instructor
here it is not about educating the use of world and e-mail, which can do anyone with a minimum of practice.

the cost varies from 500 to 800 euros +iva and have no conventions.
This is what the mass offers, it does not seem great that, only the cost is high.

 

[davide75]

Where are you from?

 

[gil]

for those who could serve tomorrow, here a list of accredited training centers.
http://www.autodesk.it/adsk/servlet/index?siteid=457036&id=15730689

 

[davide75]

cmq in my opinion having autodesk certification does not serve to work also because cad well or bad in a working week you learn quickly

 

[pompeo79]

cmq in my opinion having autodesk certification does not serve to work also because cad well or bad in a working week you learn quickly

autodesk certification does not count (or only) for the certificate, but because it guarantees that the software is taught with all the crypts and criteria of the program.

the cad in a week of work you learn it according to how you work in that company(male? Well?), certainly not touching many aspects of the program (because you don't know/you never did/you don't need).
the gaps and errors cancrenize through the teachings without possibility of improvements.

the program you learn by yourself, with hours of work on the software, sure, but you will do it better if behind this process there is a solid, updated but above all correct (manuals, courses, seminars, updates, etc.).

around there are hundreds of self-taught professionals, or with training in the company, maybe even with decades of experience but working badly or penalized, because the software is not known in its entirety and/or commands are not used properly. (just see how many still do not know what the layout is in autocad).

Perhaps the result also get it in their own way, but sacrificing time, effort and quality.

 

[gil]

I was referring to the certification of the center does not have that of the user. I think they both have a value even if underestimated.

as Pompey says one thing is to know how to use a program, one thing is to print something that looks like what you wanted.

For example, over 90% of the studios I work with, do not know what the autocad layout window is. and we are talking about a simple command in a basic software.

you will think that I work with the study "polpette and associates", and instead there are also important studies at regional and national level.

their problem is that they make drawing to trainees or little more, devoid of specific training. these even when they grow then they remain limited.

It's also true that a course really hits.

 

[davide75]

Then I can tell you that inventor I learned it myself with the pruners.I have unconscious several things alone looking at the internet, in the forum and in the old editions of the pruners so that now and then they ask me to do courses in professional centers. I learned from myself the program because they had long lost asked me to do an extra job (I am addicted already with my work ). Then it happened that in the company they bought inventor and chose me to do the course proposed by the authorized autodesk dealer (they did not know that already I knew it ) and in the end I had to explain and to show things that the teacher did not even know or to ask him specific questions on which he was taken. the only thing that matters in my opinion is to find someone really valid that explains the vault what asking the fairs at the stand own autodesk italia was difficult also for them (I speak at least for the Italian ones vsto that even the pruneri never touched the subject thoroughly ). Moreover in the company it happens that some things are not done but also depends on what one does and however the affinity of a program is obtained by continuing to use it and sometimes by doing also expressing that maybe the same certified teachers have never tried to do.
then that 90% percent of the studies with which you work do not know what is the autocad layout window can also be but you know I do not believe that the quality of a study is mixed by the knowledge of a command. and then you have to make a distinction with what you intend to make a drawing to an intern. One thing is to make him do the untouched mass and then control it, another and make them plan seriously. as they say in jargon there are the particularists and those who do the studies.
as last I have never heard of companies that wanted certification regarding the use of a cad.
What are you in Romagna? ?

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

cmq in my opinion having autodesk certification does not serve to work also because cad well or bad in a working week you learn quickly

impossible to learn a cad (any it is) in a week.
in a week you will learn the interface, logic and those 20-30 commands that serve to work in a general manufacturing company.

I am of the opinion that the courses must be done, possibly by certified entities or var and I do not say so because they are now, I have been on the other side of the barricade myself and I also did courses to private and companies, it is not that now that I am certified I have become more a phenomenon but surely what I can guarantee is a certain formative path with so much of manuals and official certificates and recognized globally.

we ourselves var do the courses and we certify ourselves, in order to ensure that we are always up to date and give the customers the maximum from the program they have purchased, this costs us time and money of course, the cost of a retail course rather than a private or an agency can not be compared, even because the tools they use are of dubious origin.
there are also e-learning courses that are also well and are certified, you spend little and are well done.

greetings

 

[pompeo79]

impossible to learn a cad (any it is) in a week.
in a week you will learn the interface, logic and those 20-30 commands that serve to work in a general manufacturing company.

I am of the opinion that the courses must be done, possibly by certified entities or var and I do not say so because they are now, I have been on the other side of the barricade myself and I also did courses to private and companies, it is not that now that I am certified I have become more a phenomenon but surely what I can guarantee is a certain formative path with so much of manuals and official certificates and recognized globally.

we ourselves var do the courses and we certify ourselves, in order to ensure that we are always up to date and give the customers the maximum from the program they have purchased, this costs us time and money of course, the cost of a retail course rather than a private or an agency can not be compared, even because the tools they use are of dubious origin.
there are also e-learning courses that are also well and are certified, you spend little and are well done.

greetings

:finger:: finger:

 

[davide75]

ozzy what I say is that sometimes the courses made by certified and authorized retailers are not always those that everyone expects you as some things within the program are not unscrupulous because some think they are not necessary to work and maybe they prefer to teach those 20-30 commands they serve to work.
the speech of the week to learn you have centered what I meant (maybe I had explained badly ) as at the end as you use it is you who go to unseen the abilities of a cad.

 

[gil]

I had thought of a course, just it would make me a relatively in-depth idea of the software.

I thought, wrong, that maybe with 200/300 euros I could do an intensive course of 2 days, just to understand the operation.

Unfortunately I discovered that the courses cost from 600 euros+iva up and are extensive. conditions, which for what I need, are not good.

said this, it is clear that one learns the software as best he believes. I agree that there are so many people with lots of good titles even to plant the head nails. and there are competent people without titles.

But one who pays all here money will want guarantees on the quality of the lessons. Otherwise, guys, we also open a training school, offices throughout Italy (we are a bit more than anything), for any program (we know the subject, we prepare ourselves with only reading the specific bignami).
not to fall into the hands of some "facilone" certification is the only guarantee.
I was amazed to know that among the many offers few can boast a title, which makes them comparable to the private lessons that I can do too.

p.

What are you in Romagna? ?

I'm a privacy policy.

 

[davide75]

If you lived near me, I could give you two straights.