legislation en-22768 iso-2768

[MATT2091]

Good morning, everyone.
reading online on the various sites I noticed that it is possible to remove from the chart the table of dimensional tolerances.
where is the correct word to insert?
Thank you in advance.

 

[DrBarde]

Forgive me, why do you want to take it off?

 

[MATT2091]

Forgive me, why do you want to take it off?

space recovery in the cartilage.
if to date it is possible to enter only the norms en-22768 iso-2768 because not to do so.
but I would like to know exactly what would be right to write.

 

[Sfiligoy]

where there was no table, I saw pictures that besides name, signature, material etc etc., had a box related to general tolerances with "general tolerances iso2768" and related classes.
nothing complex.

 

[MATT2091]

This is my revisited cartilage.
What do you say?

 

[Mario SJPD]

but I don't understand the "designed by " and "approved by" in which box do you insert it?
aaaa I understood you put it with date and name, then I would reverse the name above and given below so that and clearer the intersection.

 

[MATT2091]

but I don't understand the "designed by " and "approved by" in which box do you insert it?
aaaa I understood you put it with date and name, then I would reverse the name above and given below so that and clearer the intersection.

You're right.
makes more sense to put name above and given below.

 

[meccanicamg]

as said several times on the forum the norm is not exhaustive and often creates problems on manufacturing tolerances. many millers and operators do not know the values and do not have the norm under hand. always better the table or indicate tolerances on quotas.

 

[DrBarde]

as said several times on the forum the norm is not exhaustive and often creates problems on manufacturing tolerances. many millers and operators do not know the values and do not have the norm under hand. always better the table or indicate tolerances on quotas.

I agree, also because "oblige" to buy a norm.