line

[smoking]

Good morning to all, I would like to ask a trivial question: I would need to change the properties of section lines (usually drawn and point) and direction change lines (continuous). I would like to point out more of the lines of change of direction, engrossing them as the legislation envisages. I tried to work on "stile sight annotation" but I can't identify the parameter that interests me.
Can anyone help me?
Thank you.

 

[Tarkus]

to me the direction change angles makes them more massive by default (with iso style).
What style do you use?

 

[smoking]

I also use the isus but it displays them and prints them in the same thickness as the axis line. it is strange that in styles it shows me how it should be

 

[Tarkus]

Maybe you set a different print thickness. . .

 

[smoking]

In fact, I had already checked print thicknesses. what I have found is that there is no different type of line for the direction gears; i.e. the definition of the thickness of the section line also involves the direction change pads. There is probably an internal parameter in the system that multiplies "n" times the line thickness to generate direction change traits. in fact I had set the print thickness to 0.1 and the difference between the two lines was imprerceptible; increasing the thickness of course you notice the difference. it would not be bad to be able to manually modify also the thickness of the dashes...
If you have any alternative ideas, let me know. I thank you very much for the availability.

 

[Tarkus]

Sorry if I ask you, but since the only unification that shows the ungrossed thickness on the section direction changes is the bend.
Did you check that you didn't have the sections set in bends? .
right click on the section line,choose: "modified annotation style seen" and you see it immediately... I don't know what to think anymore.

 

[smoking]

is set in iso. However, I think it is precisely linked to the thickness of the section line. as I told you I tried to increase it and the difference is seen. He's not very orthodox as a method, but I think he's the only one. Thanks again anyway.