loft without variation of thickness

[mir]

Bye to all,
I am trying to extrude a sheet using the loft and after getting from inventor the development... only that if I use the loft the sheet metal changes thick along the profile and inventor does not give me development.

How can I do that?

In the attached dwg you will find the starting sections and the object that I would like to obtain (I got it with the loft but clearly I do not fit )

helpppp me

thanks for the help and greetings
♪

 

[GP.]

have you created thickness with thickening (ticken)?

 

[mir]

procedure I did:
- I created the final and initial section
- with offset on the sections I created the thickness of the sheet
- with loft I got the two solids
- I boleanly subtracted to the external solid the inner one thus obtaining the "lamiera"

 

[mir]

I train you half a sheet... maybe someone can tell me in inventor how to extrude on this surface.

 

[mir]

with thicken I got a solid thickness 0.5 (a thicker I was mistaken) ... but in inventor still does not give me development!

see the annex.

 

[lattu]

I'm afraid you'll have to do the development manually. All in all is a feasible thing

 

[Preparation-H]

Bye to all,
I am trying to extrude a sheet using the loft and after getting from inventor the development... only that if I use the loft the sheet metal changes thick along the profile and inventor does not give me development.

How can I do that?

In the attached dwg you will find the starting sections and the object that I would like to obtain (I got it with the loft but clearly I do not fit )

helpppp me

thanks for the help and greetings
♪

but why do you draw it in autocad and then import it into inventor?
I think it makes no sense. Since in inventor you have the sheet metal environment that is made for this type of work...

Bye!
p-h

 

[mir]

I don't know how to do it in inventor... can you help me?

 

[mir]

I'm afraid you'll have to do the development manually. All in all is a feasible thing

bè in short is not very simple even manually ...

 

[c3kkos]

procedure I did:
- I created the final and initial section- with offset on the sections I created the thickness of the sheet- with loft I got the two solids
- I boleanly subtracted to the external solid the inner one thus obtaining the "lamiera"

I don't think it's correct.

create the surface from the open curves, the offset will be the thickening itself, in this way you will be sure to get the same thickness everywhere.

 

[mir]

How do I create the surface?

 

[mir]

I did so:
- created with loft the internal solid
- I exploded the solid and took the surfaces.
- I inspected the surfaces and got the solid sheet
- I imported the .sat in inventor ... but still does not give me development!!! !

see dwg attached!

But isn't there two different twisting rays along the same inventor fold doesn't give me development?

 

[c3kkos]

the surface always creates it with the loft, starting from the two sections. . .

double curvature surfaces, those that are "imbutite" are not conventionally developed. (e.g. the sphere, whose development is approaching method)

 

[c3kkos]

I have no inventor on this workstation, so I used rhino to make the development of the outer surface.

attach the native 3dm file and dwg

 

[mir]

Thank you very much!!! with rhino it is easy to get developments because I have never tried. a curiosity, as never there is an extra piece in development (the right part formed by squares!)

Thanks again

 

[c3kkos]

I have verified the length of the developed and original edges; the figures correspond with a tolerance to the centimeter.

the procedure seems correct therefore, but at first (s)vista(?) seems an extra piece, it is true

 

[mir]

but that piece is more... otherwise it would not be symmetrical...

 

[c3kkos]

It is not more... the software simply attacked the piece straight to an extreme of development. .

to do it symmetrically, you have to split the extra piece in half and stick that half to the other extreme :d

However an image is worth a thousand words, tiè :d

 

[mir]

It is not more... the software simply attacked the piece straight to an extreme of development. .

to do it symmetrically, you have to split the extra piece in half and stick that half to the other extreme :d

However an image is worth a thousand words, tiè :d

I was just writing that by putting the lines of the folds I just missed a little bit....

 

[c3kkos]

It doesn't matter. counselling is paid equal. .

make two and a half-brown, thanks :d