• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

mancurrent height on metal scale ramp in industrial plant

  • Thread starter Thread starter stefanobruno
  • Start date Start date

stefanobruno

Guest
the height of the handlers on the horizontal plane is clear: 1100mm from the trampling to the top of the handler.
on the stairs instead I find nothing definitive,
the clearest indication I found speaks of 900 mm from the tip of the step to the top of the profile of the handler, measured on the vertical.
That's what you used to do?
I see of all kinds and they all go well or all wrong, depending on the mood of the interlocutor.

Bye.
 
It seems a little incongruent. . .
What?
I already tracked them with those parameters and they seem more than decent.
the stairs of my house, measured for the occasion, wander around in that around, 20 mm +/-.
 
the height of the handlers on the horizontal plane is clear: 1100mm from the trampling to the top of the handler.
on the stairs instead I find nothing definitive,
the clearest indication I found speaks of 900 mm from the tip of the step to the top of the profile of the handler, measured on the vertical.
That's what you used to do?
I see of all kinds and they all go well or all wrong, depending on the mood of the interlocutor.

Bye.
when I don't have any indication of the operating height on the horizontal plane = handling height on the scale.
the latter measured from the tip of the step to the top of the handler, but always attention perpendicular to the scale itself.
e.g.
- handle height on the horizontal plane = 1100 mm
- 45° inclined scale ramp
- handle height on the scale measured by the tip of the step, with angle of 45°

I don't know if I explained, but we usually have clear specifications from the clients.
tomorrow or tomorrow maybe I could put pdfs if I find them........ :
Hi.
 
the rules to be used are 14122-1, 2, 3 and 4.
Now I don't remember which one of the stairs I have no way to check.
 
the height of the handlers on the horizontal plane is clear: 1100mm from the trampling to the top of the handler....
Bye.
I find it must be at least 1 mt, unless otherwise specified by the building regulation of the place.

apart from the resistance, modified by dm 14/1/2008, take a look at the annex.View attachment PARAPETTI E RINGHIERE.pdfedit: I missed you talking about industrial plant, I leave the annex, useful for those who care about civil buildings.

Sorry...
 
I add that 500 mm is the maximum light allowed, if the scale should be higher (maybe the clinete wants 1200) could serve 2 filling profiles.
 
I add a piece of industrial archaeology, maybe it can still serve as a stefano.
Hi.
everything serves, although I see that the tilted part is constantly ignored, left to the free interpretation of the design.
I know that within me the height of the horizontal jaw was already greater than what was seen and charted elsewhere.

Thanks, bye.
 
In my opinion, the parapet posted does not comply with the provisions of Annex 4 to dl 81/08 tu sicurezza.
Finally, speaking of safety at work, national and local laws and regulations must be complied with: In the event of an accident, the designer and the employer must disproportionately comply with the correct assessment of the risks and have implemented the appropriate protective measures ...
 
What are you talking about?
The uni en 14122-x are also uni and are certainly more restrictive than the old dpr 547/55.
For example, parapets in you must be at least 1 meter high while the European standard says 1100 mm.
In view of the fact that we must also consider Article 18 paragraph z, I would say that the rule is very applicable.
It is also obvious that if on that parapet pass people of higher height and 1.9 meters, then my vdr will have to make me parapets of 1.2 meters or more....
Hi.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top