monetize your work.

[New Rider]

It seems more cad-manager than head office, and then head office of himself! :biggrin: for what you ask (a hard drive, a cad and a poor encoding system) I do not think there are to be uncomfortable categories too highlocate. In fact, the company would seem willing to grow as it invests in transferring skills inside instead of buying them in the outside market.

As regards the fact "first I put on everything then they send me away and take an apprentice to 800/month" can also be given, but I think that a minimum of optimism and confidence in the future is a necessary condition to live peacefully and seize the opportunities that happen to us. Maybe it's not the specific case, but giving up an opportunity because there's a minimum of risk can only condemn us to stay where we are and never improve.

I always smile a little when I feel of research always and anyway of t.i.: I've been working for 20 years without knowing what I'm gonna do in a month, but for now I'm happy...

I see it more like cad-manager than as head office etc... also because the poduct is not created at a contract but is very standardized. so the concept may be good, so you can fix me the documentation in 3d with its catalogues etc and then so much greetings. true hunter's speech what you say, even the company in which I worked 3 years ago promised me professional and personal growth by taking me away from a t.i for a t.d with a lower salary to create together with them (binding machines). I am currently waiting for 3 drafts and tfr.

here, however, disillusioned hunting:
One thing is to be a free professional: You're the head of yourself, you don't depend and you don't have to listen to anyone.
In the end, if things don't turn well, it also depends on you.

another speech is to be dependent on time determined with contracts that renew you every 20 days and, in the case of termination, communicate it to you at 18:01 of the last day.

among other things it also remembers that a t.i in case of change of work has a contractual power decidedly higher than t.d.

finally think about what the new company of you should think:
"this was available to change company for less money and for a t.d. when it was quietly t.iexplain to me what "authority" one day could you ask for an increase?

I honestly didn't expect some answers from them. I told him how much I perceive it is obvious that that will be the base of departure.
the company could also think : this is available to change the company less by switching to a t.d? how come? as one is willing to do this. (something happened in the current work, he did something big and he was forced to change. . )

 

[stevie]

I see it more like cad-manager than as head office etc... also because the poduct is not created at a contract but is very standardized. so the concept may be good, so you can fix me the documentation in 3d with its catalogues etc and then so much greetings. true hunter's speech what you say, even the company in which I worked 3 years ago promised me professional and personal growth by taking me away from a t.i for a t.d with a lower salary to create together with them (binding machines). I am currently waiting for 3 drafts and tfr.



I honestly didn't expect some answers from them. I told him how much I perceive it is obvious that that will be the base of departure.
the company could also think : this is available to change the company less by switching to a t.d? how come? as one is willing to do this. (something happened in the current work, he did something big and he was forced to change. . )

I see you're coming to my conclusions.
And then if they want to offer you 200 euros less than you take now I think you shouldn't be too busy with neurons.
This seems to me the classic dictator who obsessively tries to squeeze the costs on everything, and then he doesn't even know what to do.
Suppose you set up the technical office (or something similar to us), after clearly other assumptions will be necessary.
Are you sure you don't stay alone and fuck yourself?
It is good to have confidence in the future but it is also necessary to be realistic. . .

 

[ElDiablo_Tr]

update: after a second interview they offered me an undetermined time, underlining But even if I sign the undetermined I always have a 3-month trial period in which both sides can rethink. already this makes me twist my nose.not that they or I can not do it but the fact of underlining this legal ''clausula' besides gives me to think. They asked me insistently to see if I actually take the amount I told him. (confidence already on departure). I have guided them in the choice and purchase of the workstation and application 3d, I have installed the software independently, created various cards,tables etc. In short, put up a small part of work. They told me that they do not feel sure to give me what I currently take in a closed box (i.e. without greening me at work/.. but how??? When I was dealing with the softwarehouse or I did you some time lost jobs and you were next to me you didn't see what I did???!/ ). I told him that if I change I want something more than what I currently take since I will have to create/found an internal u.t with all pros and cons. How much could the salary be quantified in € said that?

Sincerely, it doesn't seem like a policy too out of the box. if there is a pretty good gain and the possibility of having the undetermined would seem a good offer.

 

[320i S]

I believe that to get into a reality, besides creating, the minimum will take 2/3 years before entering regime.
initially offered me 2 years to 1,6/1,7k/month. past the two years do not renew the contract and take one to 0.8k/month so much greetings and goodbye. I will find myself in the middle of the road and they will have, in good or evil, a small/big base.

and after a year, they send away the type from 800€/month because the technical office is unconscious.

 

[ElDiablo_Tr]

I think the idea of assessing the seriousness of the company according to the pay is wrong because the market is increasingly down.. .

 

[TECNOMODEL]

I think the idea of assessing the seriousness of the company according to the pay is wrong because the market is increasingly down.. .

It is true that the market is increasingly at the bottom, but then you get a quality adequate to what you spend.
that it's not time to start thinking that maybe the down road is wrong?

 

[320i S]

I think the idea of assessing the seriousness of the company according to the pay is wrong because the market is increasingly down.. .

to the lower with quality returned low, this is what they get, but in the case of a technical office, keep the costs so low and claim competence, dedication to the company, precision, efficiency, means not having a long-term vision, because then an employee for little more, escapes to the first occasion.
I worked in a company with a high turnover, costs and derivative times, were embarrassing.