• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

monometric asonometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter radamirez
  • Start date Start date

radamirez

Guest
Hello guys I have autocad recently and I wanted to know how to get the monometric acenometry of a solid already given 3d. thanks
 
you can crush the shift key, at the same time snap the mouse wheel and move with the mouse itself or go to view in the view palette select the view that interests you!
 
I have already tried with assonometric views but that monometric is not present. thanks the same
 
...but will you be able to do them?
I do, but the problem is you have to do it.

Being solid would have been a vector problem, but since an image can be enough, it is feasible.

turns into block, wheel to the corner you need (30/60? - 45/45?), pvista = 0,-0.01,100 and then assigns z scale to the block = 10000 (ten thousand). :cool:
406.webp
 
Sorry I'm sorry if I'm stabbing you but I didn't understand how to rotate the image.
I need 60 and 30 where should I set them? I created the block
I have to put them on a project with the axes equal to a team of 30 and 60, where the hypotenuse rests on the edge of the sheet
MONO4.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see that fundamentals are not so good... the command would be "ruota", but since you have a block maybe you do first to select it and set the corner from the property window.

look that, as I have already said, you can only export the image of what will be displayed as you can not explode the block of a unscaled solid evenly.

for the vector there would be another procedure, a little more complicated but feasible, there should be no curved parts and the hidden parts would still be displayed.
 
the beautiful "truck" conceived by gp. years ago solves in many cases, perhaps the great part, in a very ductile way the problem of the assonometria cavaliera also with other cad.
not knowing autocad I will use generic terms: why is it not possible with the same method to generate also a vector representation with hidden lines of the current view?

I can't believe
 
... why is it not possible with the same method also generate a vector representation to hidden lines of the current view?
because, as already mentioned, it is not possible to explode blocks (solid containments or surfaces) not scaled evenly, therefore it is not possible to use flatshot.

if the solids did not contain curved parts you could use xspigoli and then transform the new lines that describe the geometry in block, then usable with the procedure under review, but being only lines3d do not have "dark" power.

:smile:
 
very useful information; Thank you.

with wide use of the procedure is also generated, of course, the so-called Chinese assonometry that presents the prospectus and the plant in real form.

I can't believe

p.s. the model is rough but, in short, the sense is understood equally.
 

Attachments

  • villa_savoye_Ass_Cin.webp
    villa_savoye_Ass_Cin.webp
    22 KB · Views: 19
very useful information; Thank you.

with wide use of the procedure is also generated, of course, the so-called Chinese assonometry that presents the prospectus and the plant in real form.

I can't believe

p.s. the model is rough but, in short, the sense is understood equally.
Hello, everyone. I hook up with this post as it seeks help... I have to make an acenometry as in the photo... I tried to use the gp lisp but I can't get the right result... What do I need to type to do?

Thank you in advance!

clear
 
What photo?
What lisp?
what just result?
Annamo bbene
the photo is that attached in the comment I mentioned (otherwise I would not have done it), the lisp is asscav, lisp of which had spoken even before in the post and the "just result", that is what I would like to get from the 3d is a planometric or Chinese, that is that that which vertically translates the plant of a building keeping the prospect parallel to the picture.

I hope I have been clear now;)
 
you already have the necessary information:
- the lisp takes away 2 of gray paolo that you find easily on the net and, if not contemplated your case,
- the indications of gp in the message #10 that, setting the angle you need, should return a result however satisfactory.
Try that, then let's see.

I can't believe
 
- the indications of gp in the message #10 that, setting the angle you need, should return a result however satisfactory.
read:
- the indications of gp in the message #10 that, setting the angle you need, should return a result however satisfactory.

I can't believe
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top