• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

motion nx 7.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter ferdinandonardiello
  • Start date Start date

ferdinandonardiello

Guest
good evening, kindly I would like to know where to find information for the use of motion of unigraphics nx7.5. Thank you.
 
Usually roads are 2
the first is to carry out a course at siemens
the second with the online guide

of course the first is definitely the best road, but economically more expensive

there is also a third opotesi and it would be to buy from siemens the manuals that are provided at the courses .

I don't know.
 
ferdinandonardiello said:
good evening, kindly I would like to know where to find information for the use of motion of unigraphics nx7.5. Thank you.
Click to expand...
Do you need sporadic information or do you need a course?

if it is the second is right ip design.....if it is good the first try to ask

to a certain level maybe we can explain to you

Hi.
 
IPdesign said:
Usually roads are 2
the first is to carry out a course at siemens
the second with the online guide

of course the first is definitely the best road, but economically more expensive

there is also a third opotesi and it would be to buy from siemens the manuals that are provided at the courses .

I don't know.
Click to expand...
ip design hi, I have already read in other posts talking about nx manuals.
but such manuals are of public domain or should you enroll in a course for having them?
you can tell me where and possibly prices
 
requests must be made directly to siemens or to those who follow you as assistance .
 
having a good knowledge of the kinematism of catia5 and a good experience in the working field in that field, I would intend to extend it also to the motion of nx7.5 having known that it is also more powerful. are looking for manuals that allow me also an introductory onoscence of the necessary tools
 
Team3d said:
Do you need sporadic information or do you need a course?
if it is the second is right ip design.....if it is good the first try to ask
to a certain level maybe we can explain to you
Hi.
Click to expand...
Good evening, everyone. I just joined the forum so I also present it here, after doing it on the appropriate section: My name is morning and I'm mechanical.

from about 20 days I started using nx 7.5; the fact is that there is not much material on the web so I don't have to bother you and ask for some advice to more experienced users.

In particular, I also have a problem with motion simulator, in the sense that I do not understand the function of the individual types of joint, universal type or spherical. .
I tried among other things to make a model similar to the one proposed in this link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdfuwznzcdoBut I can't make it work. Does anyone have time to lose to give me two straights? :smile:
thanks in advance

Morning
 
bikertia said:
Good evening, everyone. I just joined the forum so I also present it here, after doing it on the appropriate section: My name is morning and I'm mechanical.

from about 20 days I started using nx 7.5; the fact is that there is not much material on the web so I don't have to bother you and ask for some advice to more experienced users.

In particular, I also have a problem with motion simulator, in the sense that I do not understand the function of the individual types of joint, universal type or spherical. .
I tried among other things to make a model similar to the one proposed in this link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdfuwznzcdoBut I can't make it work. Does anyone have time to lose to give me two straights? :smile:
thanks in advance

Morning
Click to expand...
Morning,
How I understand! I had to get into these troubles at first, too. We come to the point.
if you have too many constraints the system does not move....but if you have too much freedom, this drawback happens. I at first had put all the spherical joints (so with great freedom) and at some point the system had given me an error message so I converted the spherical joints into cylindrical joints and everything has settled. Of course, as you see in the video, you have to put on a "revolute" that makes you as a motor to your system... I hope I've been at least a little help
Hello mauro
 
Team3d said:
Morning,
How I understand! I had to get into these troubles at first, too. We come to the point.
if you have too many constraints the system does not move....but if you have too much freedom, this drawback happens. I at first had put all the spherical joints (so with great freedom) and at some point the system had given me an error message so I converted the spherical joints into cylindrical joints and everything has settled. Of course, as you see in the video, you have to put on a "revolute" that makes you as a motor to your system... I hope I've been at least a little help
Hello mauro
Click to expand...
Sorry to read me again I realize that for the rush I was a little superficial.
in my system at the end there were some spherical joints and other cylindrical ones depending on the type of joint that was actually expected. the system I analyzed had classic pins that served as pivot and other "uniball" or spherical joints that compensated for any loss.
 
Team3d said:
Morning,
How I understand! I had to get into these troubles at first, too. We come to the point.
if you have too many constraints the system does not move....but if you have too much freedom, this drawback happens. I at first had put all the spherical joints (so with great freedom) and at some point the system had given me an error message so I converted the spherical joints into cylindrical joints and everything has settled. Of course, as you see in the video, you have to put on a "revolute" that makes you as a motor to your system... I hope I've been at least a little help
Hello mauro
Click to expand...
First of all thank you very much for the availability.
what I did not understand was because in the link I posted two different types of joints were used to the heads of the biella (a spherical in connection with the handle and a universal one with the piston), and because precisely those!
I solved using two "revolutes", but I discovered it by attempts, not having understood why. .
one thing I have understood instead, if it could serve to those who will read this post, is that in the "list of motion connection" the degrees of freedom must be zero, otherwise the system is labile, so the solver fails to solve, or too bound, then blocked.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 0 (members: 0, guests: 0)
ciao
Back
Top