simon77fi
Guest
Hey, guys, I've just been looking at the movie world. I took a look at this forum and it's beautiful, a lot of interesting information for those like me who are at first. I hope I don't disturb you, but I didn't find anything that could solve my doubt-problem. Therefore, I work recently in a company that produces fashion items and precisely shoes. the need to make an e-commerce and extract everything that will concern the agency that will take care of the software development was asked to make png images of some shoes. in the company we use rhino for how much rigiarda the creation of the models but we need to realize renderings so we have not so much equipped with cinema and ar. in good siostanza I should relizzare many models of shoes, or better, the model is one but there are many variants between accessories and materials. They assume that there is a way to not have to make 2-300 shoe variants (I don't even know how much they can go out exactly) and I heard of finepass and buffer object. I ask you how I could make renderings of the following: 30 different materials that can be combined in two faces of the shoes and 5 different accessories. in practice the end user can buy the shoe composed as he himself wishes. I guess I can't be able to do all the possible shoe models and then be called back, but I think there's a way to make the faces I know could be different. One thing is certain: the 20 oguna shoes with a different material will be made sure but is it possible to make the faces that can be different apart? For example: dx side can be combined with one of the 30 materials but the left one can be or all of the basic material (and of this I have the total rendering) to oppurify with another of the 30 materials available. same as for accessories. how can I do to make "only" the faces of the shoes with the different 30 variables and vice versa render "only" the accessories on the same coordinates? clearly there image will have to be in transparent background otherwise it is impossible. Is it feasible or I say baggianate? thank you for patience and excuse ignorance. .
