nascondere quote

[strafede86]

Bye-bye.
do you know if it is possible to hide a quota from a sketch within a part?
in the tables is a very simple operation...I would like to do the same on a sketch on a part...know if it is possible?

 

[sampom]

Bye-bye.
do you know if it is possible to hide a quota from a sketch within a part?
in the tables is a very simple operation...I would like to do the same on a sketch on a part...know if it is possible?

I don't understand the question. .
normally (with default settings) the sketch odds are not seen in the part;
control from the tree, right clik up Notes, remove (if there is) the tick from the voice show function quotas. if you do it details in the model/template of the parts you will have it set by default.

greetings
Mar

 

[Mike1967]

I don't understand the question. .
normally (with default settings) the sketch odds are not seen in the part;
control from the tree, right clik up Notes, remove (if there is) the tick from the voice show function quotas. if you do it details in the model/template of the parts you will have it set by default.

greetings
Mar

I'm so sure you got it!

 

[strafede86]

You don't understand. .
My intention is to hide a share in a sketch in one part:
I have to do a part to feed 80 designers who can make a copy of the file and edit it (it is a part that will use templates that I will put on a server) but I have a share that designers do not have to change!
it is not enough to put the quota in read alone... I have already done it and it is not enough, I found the modified quota manualmete
... between 80 designers there are Chinese....and how to say... I have to find a Chinese-proof system!

ps we use sw 2010

 

[Mike1967]

Bye-bye.
do you know if it is possible to hide a quota from a sketch within a part?
in the tables is a very simple operation...I would like to do the same on a sketch on a part...know if it is possible?

I'm sorry, but if one asks "do you know if it is possible to hide a quota from a sketch within a part?", that sampom is the answer
more correct.
if you had asked the question asking how to inhibit
the modification/visualization of a sketch share, there would not have been
Frying.
beyond everything, you made your first call for help without even
And if you didn't show up, you didn't even read the reg.

returning to your problem you could check the quota
from a spreadsheet that in turn has a password.
But it is not an infallible method, how do you know if they might delete
the sketch and redesign it :biggrin:, losing, therefore, the protection of quotas???

 

[strafede86]

I'm sorry, but if one asks "do you know if it is possible to hide a quota from a sketch within a part?", that sampom is the answer
more correct.
if you had asked the question asking how to inhibit
the modification/visualization of a sketch share, there would not have been
Frying.
beyond everything, you made your first call for help without even
And if you didn't show up, you didn't even read the reg.

returning to your problem you could check the quota
from a spreadsheet that in turn has a password.
But it is not an infallible method, how do you know if they might delete
the sketch and redesign it :biggrin:, losing, therefore, the protection of quotas???

I introduced myself with another user time back...only that I no longer remember the user and pass for which I created another...however ok I will turn back then. .

about the problem I apologize if I wasn't clear... I think it's difficult to erase the sketch... seen that all functions are all related to the sketch in question....and there are several in cascade... including bookcases etc.

 

[marcof]

I introduced myself with another user time back...only that I no longer remember the user and pass for which I created another...however ok I will turn back then. .

about the problem I apologize if I wasn't clear... I think it's difficult to erase the sketch... seen that all functions are all related to the sketch in question....and there are several in cascade... including bookcases etc.

if you have to protect a sketch in an unarmed way (if they open it and delete part of the geometry and the part remake it is rebuilt correctly and you are of the cat...) you could insert that part into a set to which you only access and bind the geometry of the first gemoetry sketch contained in the axieme, save it and then distribute it around. the sketch of the part is completely defined with external references to which the 80 Chinese :smile: They can't access it because you have it in a portable hd hidden under a brick of the kitchen:tongue:. Sure that if they want to "manage" the part do it without problems, but I think you want to protect yourself from accidental changes like the dopio click on the wrong share, and in this case it should work.

 

[strafede86]

between the two I think that the idea of the excel can do to my case... external references are always to be used with pliers...

I will do some tests thanks 1000! :

 

[marcof]

between the two I think that the idea of the excel can do to my case... external references are always to be used with pliers...

the external references there are all the times that it models a part in the context of the assemblies and work smoothly, iho casomai are just the external excell tables to be used with caution.a quota tied to an excel table you can change it if in the properties of the table is flagged the item that allows it to clear from the model to the table.
in any case you must have an external file that controls the value of that quota. with the system that I indicated to you the sketch does not even have the displayed quota when edited, because the relative geometry is defined by the external reference.
in any way you have to understand the degree of security you need, that is, if it is against accidental modifications of a sketch that, however, must be partly modified by the various porgetists, or it must be a sketch in read-only without possibility to delete it; In this second case I don't know exactly how to do it. Maybe with a pdm?

 

[strafede86]

the external references there are all the times that it models a part in the context of the assemblies and work smoothly, iho casomai are just the external excell tables to be used with caution.a quota tied to an excel table you can change it if in the properties of the table is flagged the item that allows it to clear from the model to the table.
in any case you must have an external file that controls the value of that quota. with the system that I indicated to you the sketch does not even have the displayed quota when edited, because the relative geometry is defined by the external reference.
in any way you have to understand the degree of security you need, that is, if it is against accidental modifications of a sketch that, however, must be partly modified by the various porgetists, or it must be a sketch in read-only without possibility to delete it; In this second case I don't know exactly how to do it. Maybe with a pdm?

many times too many external references I have seen that they cause instability and heaviness in the recalculation, the excel table I thought to protect it with password and to leave it inside the part file, if I can't leave it inside I'm okay to save it externally, the save on a path of the server where users don't have permission to edit it and I also put it as hidden file... and I could also hide the entire column inside the excel file. .
Then I'm fine that you can't change the share from the solid. That's what I want!
mine is the first case of the two you have listed...the sketch must be editable, but not this particular quota to which I associated some important things for the cam and for the feasibility of the piece itself must have a fixed value (45).

I would say that this could be a Chinese-proof system!! :biggrin:
Monday I try to do some tests
The pdm we have, but he doesn't have these possibilities. At least I think

 

[marcof]

many times too many external references I have seen that they cause instability and heaviness in the recalculation

that would be un external reference, not "too many". reference that would never be updated

table excel I thought of protecting it with password and leaving it inside the part file (cut)
Then I'm fine that you can't change the share from the solid. That's what I want!

sin that, as I wrote to you, if from the feature manager of the configurations enters the "modification function" of the data table and put the flag on "model changes to update the data table" that quote later you can edit it.

mine is the first case of the two you have listed...the sketch must be editable, but not this particular quota to which I associated some important things for the cam and for the feasibility of the piece itself must have a fixed value

As I told you, with normal swx tools, I don't think there's any chance of blocking the change to that quota. accidental change can make it if a share in that sketch exists, and with the data table system the quota is.
if instead you get that value by changing the sketch with references within a reference set that you will have only you, who will open the part will have the sketch with all editable except that geometry, we put a line, which will result completely bound and without quotas (wanting to put a guided quota in which to add a text of instructions like "who touches this quota will be impaled in the public square", or "bad bastard do not dare to do here a double click eh!"
In both cases, if those who work there are willing to risk impalance, they can change that geometry as laughing, while it is impossible to change it by mistake.

 

[re_solidworks]

many times too many external references I have seen that they cause instability and heaviness in the recalculation, the excel table I thought to protect it with password and to leave it inside the part file, if I can't leave it inside I'm okay to save it externally, the save on a path of the server where users don't have permission to edit it and I also put it as hidden file... and I could also hide the entire column inside the excel file. .
Then I'm fine that you can't change the share from the solid. That's what I want!
mine is the first case of the two you have listed...the sketch must be editable, but not this particular quota to which I associated some important things for the cam and for the feasibility of the piece itself must have a fixed value (45).

I would say that this could be a Chinese-proof system!! :biggrin:
Monday I try to do some tests
The pdm we have, but he doesn't have these possibilities. At least I think

Frankly, I don't know a way to do what you say. As for external references I can assure you that they work well and I can create and manage huge assemblies precisely thanks to this method.
if used intelligently ensures greater stability and performance of the traditional method.