[neophyte] change thread display

[mir]

Hello.
a curiosity... can I change the display of the thread? or when you create on a cylinder any one appears as an image applied to the cylinder but, if you want, can I see it in its real form with the teeth of the propeller?

Thank you.
♪

 

[MBT]

and that maybe you update according to the step? ? ?
or that "wrap" perfectly in the corresponding thread of the nut? ?

 

[Ilario]

Let it go.... you can't do it, the auca is to generate the helicoid, but you don't need anything, weight the calculation, at the table would not comply with the visualization regulations and you couldn't quote it with the correct legislation automatically.

 

[mir]

I really don't really care to see it is that I tried to create a dentature (not helical) using the command set in the sketch ... but when I create the revolution I don't want to consider it...

It is therefore an aesthetic question and a few teeth (a twenty).

How do you advise me to do?

Thank you.
♪

 

[MBT]

I didn't understand much....
ask for a thread and then talk about non-helical toothing made with a set in the sketch. . .
explain yourself better, please

 

[Ilario]

I repeat, "see" you don't need anything mechanically, if it's just a vezzo for a graphic representation ok, but if then the pieces you need mechanically, at the design level you don't need.
the fact that you do not see the sketch series depends most probably on the fact that after serialization, the basic points of the two series triangoli catheses are not actually coincident with the base line, you should one by one apply them in coincidence bond.
advice, do the revolution of the first triangle that will almost certainly take you as a revolution, then serialize the work of revolution. Also valid advice for future serializations, serialization and non geometries of sketch.

 

[MBT]

Also valid advice for future serializations, serialization and non geometries of sketch.

parole sante :finger::finger::finger:

 

[Ilario]

Good morning! I have a problem and I know that it does not focus on the topic that is being discussed here but I no longer know who to support me... my problem is: why in the prospectus can not see the demolished wall (yellow)? Yet the phase filter is on comparative and the demolition phase on sdp!some knows how to help me? Thank you

I think if you're wrong with confidence, you're twisting like green and when you don't have any more, it's like the involts, you turn around and take the ring road.

 

[mir]

I repeat, "see" you don't need anything mechanically, if it's just a vezzo for a graphic representation ok, but if then the pieces you need mechanically, at the design level you don't need.
the fact that you do not see the sketch series depends most probably on the fact that after serialization, the basic points of the two series triangoli catheses are not actually coincident with the base line, you should one by one apply them in coincidence bond.
advice, do the revolution of the first triangle that will almost certainly take you as a revolution, then serialize the work of revolution. Also valid advice for future serializations, serialization and non geometries of sketch.

It's purely an aesthetic and non-mechanical question ... I went to the thread because I thought I'd avoid the problem of the series in the sketch
But nothing... but the working series seems to me a good idea... but after him understands that a single piece or sees it as a assembled?

I thought I'd start from a cylinder and place on it to get the teeth... do you mean that too?

 

[MBT]

If you're on the side, why would he do you a set? ? ? ?
making a set means to take a number of pieces and bind them together...


rtfm!

 

[mir]

Okay.