nx create the crude and finished in a set

[rabber83]

Good morning, I am a siemens nx user for a few days, but I used solidworks for many years.

I created a set of various parts that should be welded, then it should be worked with machine tools.
Now I should create the crude and the finished.
I'll explain better.
1) make the only welded assemblies (grey), without the processing, so as to make its design with the separate components
2) the same together, with the work (finished), and make the mass at the table of the work.

for users who know solidworks, this procedure could be done with configurations, in practice it was designed the assembling with all the processing. then created the "grezzo" configuration where the work was suppressed, and the "finished" configuration, where the same were not suppressed. at the end of the drawings you imported the views, and you chose which configuration to display, to quote and insert the component table.

for you nx experts, is there a function that can help me?

Darling greetings.

 

[ceschi1959]

Hi, from what I know there is no specific function but you can get there with a round not too long.
as you know, in nx, the files have the same extension and this allows you a great flexibility.
You have to study axiemi, master model technique and wave.
I propose you a solution Perhaps It can be your case.
I hope I've been clear.

 

[rabber83]

Hi, from what I know there is no specific function but you can get there with a round not too long.
as you know, in nx, the files have the same extension and this allows you a great flexibility.
You have to study axiemi, master model technique and wave.
I propose you a solution Perhaps It can be your case.
I hope I've been clear.
View attachment 50848

Hello, thank you very much for the answer.
I don't know the technique, but maybe I understand:
1) you have created a rough set, with only welded components.
2) You created a finite set, in which the only part is rough together, and you made him a hole.
3)You created a master set, and you threw it into the crude and the finished.
4)In the drawing once you call back together raw and once you call back the finished.
And all right?

 

[ceschi1959]

more or less,

1) ok
2) I worked the associated copies of the pieces
3) finished insert and rough views (if you see the icon is slightly different)
4) Master view and crude view

Hi.

 

[rabber83]

more or less,

1) ok
2) I worked the associated copies of the pieces
3) finished insert and rough views (if you see the icon is slightly different)
4) Master view and crude view

Hi.

Hi, I managed to do the procedure.
It's pretty slender, but you get the result.
But the thing that just doesn't go down is having to create multiple files of the same component.

I'll have to make a point. ! !

Hello, dario.

 

[ceschi1959]

But the thing that just doesn't go down is having to create multiple files of the same component.
I'll have to make a point. ! !
Hello, dario.

First of all thanks to the feedback that not everyone puts, then what do you intend to create multiple files of the same component?
Hi.

 

[rabber83]

Maybe I made some mistakes.
I created:
1) raw file
2) finished file

Did I do well?

 

[ceschi1959]

Maybe I made some mistakes.
I created:
1) raw file
2) finished file

Did I do well?

the finished file is just a set or did you do the piece again?

 

[rabber83]

the finished file is just a set or did you do the piece again?

I didn't do the piece again, but I just put the rough axieme into the finished axieme, and I did the work.
the problem is, that when I do this procedure, for the finished assembly I look for a name for the file.
In this way the crude axieme has a name, the finite axieme has another name, although the finite is closely tied to the crude