• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

o bim about sketchup :-)

  • Thread starter Thread starter warburg
  • Start date Start date

warburg

Guest
:smile: the title is a little joke, I realize, at the limit of cadddistic blasphemy... but: tomorrow I go to see and try a famous bim at an authorized dealer who makes a free presentation with demo delivery etc etc., and thinking that it costs several thousand euros I calculated that sketchup in the pro version, with also manuals and video tutorials of an Italian importer costs about 10 times less. good joke, will you rightly say:-) is there someone who uses skup seriously in their professional activity of architect or engineer?
Thank you very much
Hi.
C
 
Well, I used it for a while.
both sketchup and revit
Of course you will learn
sketchup is good for the first design phase, pull on a 3d in 3 seconds
but then the management of plants prospect sections etc is not the same as in revit

forget me if you want but from my experience, I would never use sketchup for an architectural project from beginning to end, if anything in the first stage of conception

I think this was the idea of who created it.

sketchup, therefore sketch, is precisely to make sketches progress:)
 
Sorry, I just landed in this community.
a question: is the classic autocad architecture better at all times? for those of you who have already done this experience in some way, would he give me advice or own evaluations?
 
the autodesk currently points on revit of quuello that I know

so you better revit if you have to stay with autodesk
 
but beyond the market reasons, it is better to design in autocad or with the bim?that is it is more "natural" (forgive the term...) the cad or bim?s always according to vs. experiences. . .
Thank you.
 
Well... .
Then I ask you the questions:
when protruding
- would you prefer to draw the prospetti sections or to reason with an object 3d?
Do you prefer to draw windows, walls, doors, or lines?

the passage is difficult.. I know.. but after a period of study, satisfaction is not little
p.s. you will need a powerful machine cmq :) better if 64 bits ;)
 
we say that I already use a programme that works both the 2d and in 3d and is quite immediate and simple, great to immediately realize the ideas of a possible customer...tant is that of times I use it with the customer next to me. is a software that allows to insert objects, doors, windows, furniture etc..., both from 2nd and from 3d...so a hint of processing type bim already there is.the problem is that it does not satisfy me at rendering level, that it is quite simple and little photorealistic, especially in interior design.so it would be to think that maybe it is better the revit, but I have a fear that it is not as immediate and "natural" term. .
 
and regarding the machine I have a laptop asus, so win business view 32 bit, with cpu intel dual core duo 2.10 ghz, ram 4 gb, nvidia card gt 120m with 1 gb dedicated memory and hd 500 gb... does it hold on renderings?
 
to work
But you have to be careful about renderings with artificial lights on revit
it takes a lot of time

are passed to a 64 bit machine, 1.5 gb dedicated memory for graphics, 8 gb ram
and from a portable conle yourself your characteristics have passed from a rendering of 2 hours to a 15 minutes

cmq for a render with many artifact lights and a very vast project.. with the new car it took 10-14 hours :)
 
I'll learn! So better stay on the light! at most I will put the pc in a refrigerator x avoid that you overheat.. the commodore 64 I mean!! and what do you think there will be problems with win7?
 
emi_973 said:
we say that I already use a programme that works both the 2d and in 3d and is quite immediate and simple, great to immediately realize the ideas of a possible customer...tant is that of times I use it with the customer next to me. is a software that allows to insert objects, doors, windows, furniture etc..., both from 2nd and from 3d...so a hint of processing type bim already there is.the problem is that it does not satisfy me at rendering level, that it is quite simple and little photorealistic, especially in interior design.so it would be to think that maybe it is better the revit, but I have a fear that it is not as immediate and "natural" term. .
Click to expand...
as kubbah said, the passage is not "natural", but with a little good will you soon get to a decent use.
in revit, there are some valid points, which are:
- the use of families, for whose creation is not bound to the knowledge of any specific programming language
- a complete management of the project, from the development phase, to the preparation of documents for the various practices to be presented to the bodies set up
- quantity management, with various abachi
- the possibility of developing the project in separate blocks, and then in separate places) and assembling it at the end in a single file
...

Specifically there are also some weaknesses, such as the management of the "terrene", the export of numerical data (abachi, tables, etc.) that must be refined and simplified, ...

the rendering engine, mental ray, is inserted in the sw with a "light" version but more than enough for the design needs, however to improve ...
 
Forgive me bimchecker but I point out that this discussion is 3 years ago! Can you stop with all this spam please? You're getting annoying
 
that then, said among us, in this bimsight discussion there is like the cabbages to snack!! is talking about modeling/design software, bimsight is a project collaboration software! what is it?? It's like you're comparing the diesel engine to the colza oil engine, and you jump out and say you try the new tires!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Staff online

Members online

Total: 1 (members: 1, guests: 0)
Back
Top