o-ring in nx

[lostico]

quoto.
I've been modeling for 15 years, but still now I'm more doubtful about certainties.
However, aggression is always a bit annoying.

in mouse:
I use reference sets, because having to model multiple versions, it does not seem so counterproductive.

I read only now, otherwise I would have answered immediately:
reference sets all life.

It must be said that I have not followed the evolution of the nx4 deformable parts.
the weight problem is negligible, we talk about nbr or similar.. .

 

[ceschi1959]

please someone tell me: I have never been able to deal with these problems with or. why is this need? Is this representation?
a different case happened to me with electrical components with the same code but with the possibility to mount faston in different positions. the company opted for reference sets (with faston shaped in the part).

 

[The_Matrix]

1) deformable part leads to the level of the axieme in which all its modeling, inside the axieme as the only feature.
mass use, as could be normalized, block the axieme.
often couple creates problems.
I'm not the solution.

2) the solution of reference sets does not distort weights.
or type a = r.s. type a, and so on,

I contested this solution as it is as if I modeled 4 or.

I believe it is at the moment the only solution, given the number of participants in the discussion.

the ref solution set by force alters the weights. (I meant automatic rollups at assembly level)
... but if it is not a problem, for charity, go ahead with this method! :finger:

 

[Utente NX]

the ref solution set by force alters the weights. (I meant automatic rollups at assembly level)
... but if it is not a problem, for charity, go ahead with this method! :finger:

reference sets do not alter weights.
that of the part you have to make a manual setting because it automatically takes all the volumes, but if you tell him to take only one solid revolution for each reference set, then it remains correct.

I don't create any reference sets for axiemes, and I think they don't need any more.

then I had confirmation that my solution is the only feasible and simple.

for arrogance, I'm sorry, but I don't feel like I was.
I have only specified that if I ask which highway to take from bologna to milan, agree with me that suggest to take the brenner and the serene, it does not seem to suggest.

 

[The_Matrix]

reference sets do not alter weights.
that of the part you have to make a manual setting because it automatically takes all the volumes, but if you tell him to take only one solid revolution for each reference set, then it remains correct.

I don't create any reference sets for axiemes, and I think they don't need any more.

then I had confirmation that my solution is the only feasible and simple.

for arrogance, I'm sorry, but I don't feel like I was.
I have only specified that if I ask which highway to take from bologna to milan, agree with me that suggest to take the brenner and the serene, it does not seem to suggest.

hi u nx, but what method do you use for weight calculation? I'm curious.
from what I know, if you use the assembly adv you can specify which ref set should be used... if you use the standard nx counts all the solids of the part.
therefore it is altered.
Then, for charity, it is about or... so the problem does not arise.
If you use the aa, you can also put the weight "asserted" that solves the problem, even if the procedure is manual and then it should be maintained.

 

[lostico]

hi u nx, but what method do you use for weight calculation? I'm curious.
from what I know, if you use the assembly adv you can specify which ref set should be used... if you use the standard nx counts all the solids of the part.
therefore it is altered.
Then, for charity, it is about or... so the problem does not arise.
If you use the aa, you can also put the weight "asserted" that solves the problem, even if the procedure is manual and then it should be maintained.

Actually, I'm curious.

 

[Utente NX]

hi u nx, but what method do you use for weight calculation? I'm curious.
from what I know, if you use the assembly adv you can specify which ref set should be used... if you use the standard nx counts all the solids of the part.
therefore it is altered.
Then, for charity, it is about or... so the problem does not arise.
If you use the aa, you can also put the weight "asserted" that solves the problem, even if the procedure is manual and then it should be maintained.

nx calculates weight based on what is contained in the reference set.
You may have 100 cubes in the model, but in the reference set model you have manually unchecked all the cubes and nx calculates 'zero'.
I in the or have four solid revolutions and 4 reference sets for each revolution and the weight is set correctly.