of the bonds and the penis...

[GiGa]

I am working on a set of about 6000 celebrations (with about 300 parts) with inventor 2013. not a mini set, but not even exaggerated. . .
After a first version that I didn't "dominate anymore" (despite there were no mistakes, it was all completely blocked, like when there are conflicting constraints), I rebuilt the axieme to try to eliminate errors on the constraints that I couldn't handle anymore. . .
fact is that, while inserting the least possible number of constraints, solving the incompatibilities immediately, in short trying to maintain the maximum "cleanness", the good inventor goes into the ball and often, after a reconstruction of the axame or its reopening, it signals me of the incompatible constraints... to solve most of the times it is sufficient to confirm the bond and "magicly" inventor understands that it already worked everything (noious though when there are twenty ties packed). .
Now I'm going crazy to place manual stops with cardanic extensions. . sleeves that are fired miles away (obviously with inverted plans), plans that do not want to align... In short, or I renounce the flexibility of the assemblies (because it can serve something) risking in case of any changes not to update the positions, or keep the flexibility and continue to go crazy trying to align the whole...

Excuse the vent, but does it happen to you, or am I particularly inept?

ps: I exclude an installation problem because I also happened on the old car... But then I blamed the pc...

 

[cacciatorino]

I am working on a set of about 6000 celebrations (with about 300 parts) with inventor 2013. not a mini set, but not even exaggerated. . .

I don't know inventor, but from experience on if and swx, it's always convenient to try to create as much as possible subaxis and functional groups, so that the "father" assemblies see below only a few macrogroups.

If you haven't already tried to do it, maybe it improves something.

 

[Catafratto]

it also happens to me when I have flexible assemblies with maximum and minimum limits, with "normal" flexible assemblies with less frequency; However following the tips here in the forum I saw that for having less probremi possible it is better to ensure that everything is bound completely. I'll explain better. when inserting a screw not only hole pin but also block rotation. when I 'made the good' advice worked egregiously.

 

[GiGa]

the principle used is precisely this... sub-assiem where possible and make flexible to adapt to the main axieme. . .
Who knows, maybe with inventor it would work better with the parts all on the same level... I have a strong suspicion that it is flexibility to create problems.

 

[Catafratto]

Try to temporarily fix everything you can in the various sub-axis: a couple of times helped me

 

[MBT]

It happens to me too.

 

[MauroM]

I don't know inventor, but from experience on if and swx, it's always convenient to try to create as much as possible subaxis and functional groups, so that the "father" assemblies see below only a few macrogroups.

If you haven't already tried to do it, maybe it improves something.

I agree in full, they should teach him at kindergarten.
When I see axioms with a kilometric browser of serialized bolts, my blood boils.

 

[Tarkus]

I'm working on a set
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... to solve most of the times it is sufficient to confirm the bond and "magicly" inventor understands that it already worked everything (noious though when there are twenty ties packed)...

always happened, even with previous versions.
a thing to which autodesk never put remedy

I don't know inventor, but from experience on if and swx, it's always convenient to try to create as much as possible subaxis and functional groups, so that the "father" assemblies see below only a few macrogroups.
If you haven't already tried to do it, maybe it improves something.

:smile: