offset di superfici

[Dylan]

Hi.

imagine you have to design a particular. we hypothesize a pose (or a primer...). we will have the surfaces of our mathematical model (we hypothesize sculpted or styled surfaces to understand). to achieve good design often we may need to offset a group of merged surfaces. you want to create a downloaded area to leave unworked if our piece is made in fusion, you want to compensate for a thickness of the material.

let's miss the talk of keeping surfing as they are and then manage the milling offsets. . I am talking about offsetting groups of surfaces together with approximate results valid to create out-figures or completes, and precise offset surfing.

I have a way to see many different mathematicians made with the most varied systems and I see that this type of work is done excellently by the usual caskets etc.

you who like me use tops how you solve the matter when you meet her?

dylan

 

[monster]

hi dylan I don't know what you mean if you need the optics for laying or if you need an area to offer without shaking the solid...

 

[Dylan]

The question is more generic. as I said sometimes there is the need to have specific areas. the classic case is to make a laying (for example!!!) where we want to rest a sheet or something of which we only have a "skin" and we know the thickness (resolable case by milling with negative/positive offsets in cam).

another case could be in the design of a equipment wanting to create something with a group of surfaces and an offset of this last.

an even more special case could be in the creation of "surface grezzi" for the cam. often milled particular complex moolto where I would be comfortable to be able to create offset surfaces to use as rough. Don't tell me that you can set the offset when you create a rough from surfaces. It's just that in that way I say I could easily create very efficient roughings by putting rough where I need it, but it's useless now that you explain these things...

I noticed that using the "solid" "thick" command you can get something but only if offsets are lower than the negative curved rays of surfing... algorithms of other cad , considered a surf group, can create a unique and approximate surface for example to create thicknesses or something. . .

It will be that these needs I only have them....because I see a lot of mathematicians where there are groups of offset surfaces. all done in a bad way. when I tried I had a lot of problems. I was therefore asking how you can solve these problems when you meet them.
dylan

 

[monster]

Well if you have to offer surfaces on precise areas just create a 2d profile and project it normatively in the area that interests you to manage.poi the trims with dividing command and then with the thick command from the optics you want...it is explained
I don't think I can't... if later you find that we have to go beyond the bending radius and the system is ixxxxa patience. . .

I think you have a casket and sw... maybe you should apply more on 3d commands...:biggrin:

 

[Dylan]

...maybe you should apply more on 3d commands...:biggrin:

You're right. But there are other 3d things I mean . much less virtual ))

As soon as I have time I send you an example... I feel like I can't explain myself. . .
hi chalk ;-)

dylan

 

[Babblu3]

I use toptron and I wondered if there was a specific pdm for toptron or what pdm you tried with toptron and.
thanks and hello

 

[cimaguy]

about the offset, why not use the "extent object" command in "offest faces"?