omnicad v8 ready for your pc

[flaviobrio88]

to show the new associative parametric v8 omnicad I created a crumbler by modeling it from the beginning.

excuse the simplicity of the file and the ancient design and little beautiful but take it as such is only demonstrative.

once created you can see that in case a feature is impossible to update however omnicad goes on until the end and then the operator can edit the area to try to make it "upgredable"


http://www.omnicad.com/video/raccoglibriciole.mp4

 

[cacciatorino]

http://www.omnicad.com/video/raccoglibriciole.mp4

mi sa che il video e' corrotto, non si vede ne con vlc ne con winamp ne con windows media player.... :frown:

 

[heterodyne]

to show the new associative parametric v8 omnicad I created a crumbler by modeling it from the beginning.

excuse the simplicity of the file and the ancient design and little beautiful but take it as such is only demonstrative.

once created you can see that in case a feature is impossible to update however omnicad goes on until the end and then the operator can edit the area to try to make it "upgredable"


http://www.omnicad.com/video/raccoglibriciole.mp4

Nice, buddy. excellent improvements also on style, very close to how to work solidthinking; But here everything works properly, especially the fittings... :finger:

 

[flaviobrio88]

mi sa che il video e' corrotto, non si vede ne con vlc ne con winamp ne con windows media player.... :frown:

I tried to charge him up www.screencast.com/users/omnicad/folders/default/media/827fdb3d-5abc-4ba2-8d64-e1e3da0535ef

Nice, buddy. excellent improvements also on style, very close to how to work solidthinking; But here everything works properly, especially the fittings... :finger:

thanks I don't know st I'll try to see something on yt

 

[cacciatorino]

I tried to charge him up

I saw him now.

very nice, but I have a question: It seems to me that this video shows the associative function, not the parameterizable constraints.

In the sense: when I think of a parametric cad, I mean, that allows to say for example that this edge will be 2.5 times the other one, or things like that.

 

[flaviobrio88]

I saw him now.

very nice, but I have a question: It seems to me that this video shows the associative function, not the parameterizable constraints.

In the sense: when I think of a parametric cad, I mean, that allows to say for example that this edge will be 2.5 times the other one, or things like that.

Thank you.
If you look at the end when I re-edition insert a value of 300 or 200 I don't remember well, but I can insert a *2.5 , in fact I can also insert an equation

 

[cacciatorino]

Thank you.
If you look at the end when I re-edition insert a value of 300 or 200 I don't remember well, but I can insert a *2.5 , in fact I can also insert an equation

Yes, I have seen it, but in the video you do not understand well if these odds are persistent, or disappear once the value editing is finished (I hope it is clear the concept I am expressing).
I have seen that even in other points insert numerical values, such as the offset share or the fittings, but it would be interesting to see how (in case it is possible) relationships can be inserted between the variables.

 

[flaviobrio88]

always staying on simple you could show me with an image what you would like to see
If you mean a relationship understood as if I have a circle of value 10 and then I tell him that at the center of this circumference there will be another circumference of radius 7 then in this case changing the first circle and bringing it to 12 will not change anything to the inner circle.
Menter if I tell him that circle 7 actually has a distance of 3 mm from the cntro of circumference 10 then any value I insert at the first circle I will always have a distance of 3 mm

 

[cacciatorino]

always staying on simple you could show me with an image what you would like to see
If you mean a relationship understood as if I have a circle of value 10 and then I tell him that at the center of this circumference there will be another circumference of radius 7 then in this case changing the first circle and bringing it to 12 will not change anything to the inner circle.
Menter if I tell him that circle 7 actually has a distance of 3 mm from the cntro of circumference 10 then any value I insert at the first circle I will always have a distance of 3 mm

I have this old example video, made time ago I don't remember what:

by inserting the number of teeth from the keyboard, the cad automatically recalculates the primitive diameter of the gear and updates the number of excavations necessary to realize the teeth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdw8n1bsp4upractically the various geometrical sizes are linked by mathematical equations, so changing a value, they change to cascade others, maintaining the consistency of the model.

I mean parameterization in this way, but I have mechanical training, maybe those who do "style" use a different lexicon.

 

[flaviobrio88]

I have this old example video, made time ago I don't remember what:

by inserting the number of teeth from the keyboard, the cad automatically recalculates the primitive diameter of the gear and updates the number of excavations necessary to realize the teeth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdw8n1bsp4upractically the various geometrical sizes are linked by mathematical equations, so changing a value, they change to cascade others, maintaining the consistency of the model.

I mean parameterization in this way, but I have mechanical training, maybe those who do "style" use a different lexicon.

From my point of view it seems to me more a macro, but also I cannot express myself.