operation

[Tarkus]

Hello everyone,
if in a .ipt file comes another .ipt file, I have the possibility to choose the option "body as work surface",
and I only get the derived surfaces.
If a .iam file comes, I don't have this option.
to get it I must first derive the axieme in a .ipt file, and then create another file where to derive the previous
to have the bodies of only superfice.
is there no possibility to directly derive a file of assembly and to hold a derivative of only surfaces?
Thank you.

 

[dsw]

I am not sure I have understood, in the style of derivation you can choose various options, including that of the surfaces.
here the reference to the guide

 

[Peppe]

Hello everyone,
if in a .ipt file comes another .ipt file, I have the possibility to choose the option "body as work surface",
and I only get the derived surfaces.
If a .iam file comes, I don't have this option.
to get it I must first derive the axieme in a .ipt file, and then create another file where to derive the previous
to have the bodies of only superfice.
is there no possibility to directly derive a file of assembly and to hold a derivative of only surfaces?
Thank you.

ciao @takes,

test by the axieme, level of detail -> new substitute -> simplified contour
from options create choose surfaces
of course it will be a unique superfice.

 

[Tarkus]

I am not sure I have understood, in the style of derivation you can choose various options, including that of the surfaces.
here the reference to the guide

drifting ipt sì, drifting in.

 

[Zac69]

drifting ipt sì, drifting in.

Hello tarkus.
I saved a set in .igs
I reopened it by selecting in the window to import only the surfaces and it works.
I think it's the only way.

 

[Tarkus]

Hello tarkus.
I saved a set in .igs
I reopened it by selecting in the window to import only the surfaces and it works.
I think it's the only way.

It's always an extra file creation.
so much it is worth deriving a set in an ipt, and then derive the surfaces of the latter in the target file.
it seems that with only one passage the surfaces of a set cannot be derived.
We'll have a reason... .

 

[Peppe]

It's always an extra file creation.
so much it is worth deriving a set in an ipt, and then derive the surfaces of the latter in the target file.
it seems that with only one passage the surfaces of a set cannot be derived.
We'll have a reason... .

since you have to turn an object into obvious surfaces that you will still have to derive and create new files. What do you have to do?

 

[Tarkus]

since you have to turn an object into obvious surfaces that you will still have to derive and create new files. What do you have to do?

nothing that, I want it to be transparent and having a weight equal to 0

 

[infallibile_GF]

Just use the command simplifies, remove all simplifications of course and as output "single-set" slides. you get an ipt part composed of a surface.

 

[Peppe]

nothing that, I want it to be transparent and having a weight equal to 0

if your iam is placed in another set you can refer it (do not calculate the weight) and you can put it in “transparent” both commands with the right button on the axieme

 

[Tarkus]

if your iam is placed in another set you can refer it (do not calculate the weight) and you can put it in “transparent” both commands with the right button on the axieme

It's not my case, it comes to an ipt with which I will make a multibody.

 

[dsw]

using multibody inserting it as a reference, can it be a solution?