• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

Party [ error 319]

  • Thread starter Thread starter cacciatorino
  • Start date Start date
to tequila, see that it is already a reality. :-)
creo direct already uses granite and I tried it, no problem with the old osd files.
also the file extension is the same (*.prt.1).
realize a model in direct (without tree feature), open it in parametric and surprise of the surprises the model tree appears.

between a bit I place you a couple of exercises so we see how you handle the acuracy (precision) of the models.
 
Hell for me this limit is a big problem!!! !
having to model the stars trek spaceships, being the ncc-1701e sovereign class 685 meters long how do I solve??? ? :biggrin:
the difference between me and you:... is that I can model an entire inhabited center by changing only the precision of the model.
it happens in the architectural relief of having measures greater than 1000 meters.
It happens that I scan the entire city, I put it in creo and I write a cad pattern done properly.
I challenge anyone to do the same ... bim including:smile:
 
realize a model in direct (without tree feature), open it in parametric and surprise of the surprises the model tree appears.
It's not as painless as they make you believe, there was this deelip article quite puzzled about the thing:

http://www.deelip.com/?p=6790practically what makes creo/direct is simply hiding from the tree the divorces, but records them all. If you move a hole five times, you'll find five shift operations recorded, and that's obviously a non-senso.

I remember then a user here on cad3d who had put on the table a perforated piece: the quotas remain referred to the original position of the hole, and do not follow the shift. I'm sure it's a bug they're gonna fix.
 
the difference between me and you:... is that I can model an entire inhabited center by changing only the precision of the model.
it happens in the architectural relief of having measures greater than 1000 meters.
It happens that I scan the entire city, I put it in creo and I write a cad pattern done properly.
I challenge anyone to do the same ... bim including:smile:
but then the cylinder at distance 500,000 from the origin with fitting r=0,1 can you do it?
 
but then the cylinder at distance 500,000 from the origin with fitting r=0,1 can you do it?
with absolute precision 0,0012 I can realize two cylinders mirrored compared to the origin, distance 5000.000 from the origin (then with distance 10^6 between them) diameter 5,05 mm, height 5 with radius 0.1 or 2,4 (leaving a tenth) without any error.
I continue with the evidence
 
but in the environment part or together? I made the parts in a separate environment, which I designed a sketch at 500,000 from the origin.
in part environment.
I have verified that the limit distance of the two circles from the origin is = 504997.475

But... this is becoming a real challenge :-) ... give him below that I want to see where we come :-)
 
Modeling 18.1 fails in this test, but I can't tell you if I'm using the granite kernel or acis.
 

Attachments

  • 18.1.webp
    18.1.webp
    70.5 KB · Views: 6
here is an image of the model from which you can read distance and diameter.
from the tree you can read that the features do not fail.
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    74.1 KB · Views: 18
So?! What happened?

But if I have to talk about creo direct what I do? What's his fuck?
 
What we do is open a separate section, since it seems to live in its own life compared to osd?
 
I ask for a period of time to open a creo direct section, if necessary, if we open specific sub-areas.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top