solokite
Guest
Good morning, everyone.
how do you see a passage from creo to nx in the field of economic savings (>20licences)?
how do you see a passage from creo to nx in the field of economic savings (>20licences)?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ceschi1959
Guest
More info? what kind of licenses you need, if you already or intend to take a pdm-plm, the type of product you do and so on.Good morning, everyone.
how do you see a passage from creo to nx in the field of economic savings (>20licences)?
gil
Guest
I don't know anything about prices and I don't know the two programs in depth. but I would be disconcerted if nx cost less than creo.
solokite
Guest
So you wouldn't do any savings? Let's go! can it be that these steps are made to take meatballs and to do business restructuring/reorganization (write)?I don't know anything about prices and I don't know the two programs in depth. but I would be disconcerted if nx cost less than creo.
cacciatorino
Guest
probably there are data interface reasons with an important customer or supplier.So you wouldn't do any savings? Let's go! can it be that these steps are made to take meatballs and to do business restructuring/reorganization (write)?
or the company has decided to standardize the design platform on one software, in case there are multiple locations for example.
I don't think the savings you're talking about is the reason for the change, because the cost of the pass is much higher than the cost-saving software, and often the software that is threatened to be abandoned makes a counter-off that reduces or eliminates the cost disadvantage.
solokite
Guest
you could be a data interface speech but not having a unique customer (and therefore many more types of exchange files) could be a risk.probably there are data interface reasons with an important customer or supplier.
or the company has decided to standardize the design platform on one software, in case there are multiple locations for example.
I don't think the savings you're talking about is the reason for the change, because the cost of the pass is much higher than the cost-saving software, and often the software that is threatened to be abandoned makes a counter-off that reduces or eliminates the cost disadvantage.
doing much co-design is a risk (economic) but thanks to industry 4.0 fear passes.....