peaks v9 second part

[Dylan]

I think the news of the moment is the new release dtoptron and the discussion so called is closed.. .

There were post ot, scaramucce, learned people who put the hour where they do not need and ignorant workers who would like to exchange views on a tool they use every day.

So.
out the comments, indiscretions and all that's come to gall of 'this new release! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

dylan

 

[stinit]

I think the news of the moment is the new release dtoptron and the discussion so called is closed.. .

There were post ot, scaramucce, learned people who put the hour where they do not need and ignorant workers who would like to exchange views on a tool they use every day.

So.
out the comments, indiscretions and all that's come to gall of 'this new release! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

dylan

as in all the discussions that happen in the real world even on a forum can happen that talking about a topic you go to finish or.t. ...


what I was told a few months ago by a microsystem technician on version 9.0 today is located on the official website... but more than this I don't know..

on my part I have prepared a series of modifications/improvements that I believe useful for the development of the software; if my requests are similar or equal to those of other users of this program the microsystem will assess the possibility to intervene by directing the development just in the direction desired by those who use it every day... :finger:

I think for those who use it is a good time to make their complaints become "constructive" instead of the usual bar talk...

 

[foreight]

I was yesterday at the release of the v9.0 treviso, here are some news that seem interesting to me:

- spline/ellissi/contorni offset inside the sketcher
- move/copy/wheel in the sketcher as in 3d
- improvement of the connection algorithm between surfaces
- new adagia function (we hope not to be a paid function)
- quotas and notes in the environment 3d
- symmetrical share
- use of multicore processors
- novelty in parametric relationships with the possibility to give a name to parameters and to define constants

in the cam the news are many:

- calculation of the most precise crude
- new profile selection interface
- profile as a contact point
- profile as a live edge
- new simulator
- recovery along the contour
- move/copy/route p.u. all new

 

[Dylan]

- new adagia function (we hope not to be a paid function). What is it? can you kindly make us understand how it works and how it works?
- quotas and notes in the environment 3d. Cool.
- use of multicore processors. can only multicore or even two-processor workstations work with 2 processors on a single session?
in the cam the news are many:

- calculation of the most precise crude. polyhedric crude type (auton, tebis) or the same fuffe ever? I mean, after 3+2 work all around the top and below the model, we can see our crude or do we always have the usual ugly and anachronistic vision of the crude model in a tool axis?
- new profile selection interface
- profile as a contact point
- profile as a live edge. Wow. Speriam functions properly.
- new simulator. Wow. Beautiful. Speriam functions properly.
- I'll take it back.. wow!

dilate

 

[foreight]

I press that all the news was presented quickly as they were many and still did not send me the license to try them on the field.

- new adagia function (we hope not to be a paid function)
What is it? can you kindly make us understand how it works and how it works?

serves to deform a geometry(2d/3d) from a surface/plan of departure to a arrival; for example I create an extruded logo on a floor and I adage it on a surface

- use of multicore processors
can only multicore or even two-processor workstations work with 2 processors on a single session?

both multicore and mutli processor and the beauty is that you can decide whether to use them all, leave one free or use only one

- calculation of the most precise crude
polyhedric crude type (auton, tebis) or the same fuffe ever? I mean, after 3+2 work all around the top and below the model, we can see our crude or do we always have the usual ugly and anachronistic vision of the crude model in a tool axis?

here I can not answer you precisely because I only carry out 3x processing, but I remember that they said that you no longer need to use the rough multi axis