Hi guys:
two questions about these processes I couldn't separate the solids and the factual fold does not determine a development ... I deduce that these two processes are "simply" aesthetic ... or am I wrong?
as far as I know the inventor developments do them only for properly shaped sheet metal parts; I never used it, I tried but I don't see the "solid egg" option, I know as command for plastic printed parts. the fold part used on the sheets creates a developable solid.
Hi.
the concept of "full part" is different from the sheet.
example, a sheet metal box is designed "finished" and then its consequence is development
on the fold part is the opposite, you cut a tube to size defined and then bend it.
the nervation, being then a particular plate or laser cuts (lamiera) is added as a separate code in the .iam of welded
so I usually do:
single part .ipt for tubular
single .ipt part for ribbing (in sheet metal environment)
together. iam for final welded
but you talk about the classic cycle... I just find it curious that there's ribbing but I can't use it in an iam and that doesn't create a body in an ipt... I'll explain? What do I do if I have to do it separately and bind it?