• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

positioning parts together

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stemox
  • Start date Start date

Stemox

Guest
I should place the vertical plate so that the highlighted face matches the blue edge, how do I? in the various constraints I do not find the coincidence with a edge. igo image
 

Attachments

  • coincidenza.webp
    coincidenza.webp
    10.7 KB · Views: 2
try to use the constraint by selecting appropriate references. help with the selection filter that you find at the bottom right. If you can't, I'll post some pictures.
 
I should place the vertical plate so that the highlighted face matches the blue edge, how do I? in the various constraints I do not find the coincidence with a edge. igo image
Hi.
use the edge bond on surface.
 
in the bond options I do not find edge - surface, yes are: coincident, distance, normal, tangentece others that now I do not remember (I am not on the machine where I create) ....the two surfaces are not orthogonal.
 
in the bond options I do not find edge - surface, yes are: coincident, distance, normal, tangentece others that now I do not remember (I am not on the machine where I create) ....the two surfaces are not orthogonal.
Bye!

with creo, choose coinciding (as suggested by crowd76) and picks edge and surface (or vice versa).
later orienti using other references.
with the versions have changed the names to some constraints, but the concepts remain almost identical.

ps: if you update the profile with the software you use, maybe the help is more targeted.
 
All right, guys, I can talk to a corner too... I thought I was just picking up the surface.
 
I would have another positioning problem, I should place a plate at a certain distance not having flat surfaces to refer to, attach image.
 

Attachments

  • Assieme.webp
    Assieme.webp
    21.8 KB · Views: 2
I would have another positioning problem, I should place a plate at a certain distance not having flat surfaces to refer to, attach image.
for my little experience, the most "solid" system of all is to create a floor in halfway on the perforated outer bracket, idem on the plate you want to place, and constraints between them the planes.
(I usually, unless special needs, I realize my pieces as symmetrical as possible: In your case, it would be enough to coincide with 2 floors of the main tares).
 
for my little experience, the most "solid" system of all is to create a floor in halfway on the perforated outer bracket, idem on the plate you want to place, and constraints between them the planes.
(I usually, unless special needs, I realize my pieces as symmetrical as possible: In your case, it would be enough to coincide with 2 floors of the main tares).
I'd do the same thing.
 
for my little experience, the most "solid" system of all is to create a floor in halfway on the perforated outer bracket, idem on the plate you want to place, and constraints between them the planes.
(I usually, unless special needs, I realize my pieces as symmetrical as possible: In your case, it would be enough to coincide with 2 floors of the main tares).
I fully agree... and I remember that it is very important not to miss the plan:wink:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top