possible forum bugs

[andrea1974]

Hello, today something curious happened that could be a problem, mark it.
where I worked before I asked for lumens in the solidworks forum about a mirrored part of a mechanical piece and as recommended by moderators I attached the file for analysis. now, having changed company, I have fatality resumed that discussion undertaken months before and I reopened the old file of the company that obviously still works and is on the net. Do you understand the problem? I can now read the old files about the other company and this must not be able to happen in the new company.. .

 

[DrBarde]

you should never share the company documents you work for, but examples.

 

[andrea1974]

the moderator says to add the file.... which then is right, it is not always possible to make examples by rebuilding the piece reinventing, it also takes time are sometimes complex pieces, it first takes to bring the piece into question, but this problem occurs then...

 

[DrBarde]

I don't know, I'll be old, but I would never put a sensitive document on the network. already are one of those that would not even give around digital documents if not pdf/a suitably protected.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I do not see where the bug is; if the file attached above creates privacy issues, it asks moderators to delete it.

an attached file will always be available until it is unreachable from the site server, which is different from a link to an external resource that stops being usable when the link is somehow interrupted.

 

[gerod]

I agree with colleagues. if you shared the file, you made it available to the community. So it's your responsibility. If you want to remove it, just let us know what the file is.
industrial secret must be protected from the beginning.
Hi.

 

[andrea1974]

Well I talked about bugs to give a title to the discussion, in fact it is not said that it is a bug, it could also be totally blame for who puts it on the net, it was just to protect himself here... in the specific case of the part inserted there are no secrets.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In my opinion, I shall be discussing in general, but especially if the annex you have put has no secrets.
that on the network, not only on a forum, you should pay attention to what you publish should be, with all the privacy speeches and with all the social media that exist in the last 10/15 years, now discounted.
therefore, yes, the fault is totally of those who insert it because everyone is responsible for what binds and should have the ability to evaluate the delicacy of the data contained therein. Sometimes the interlocutors point out to eliminate sensitive data, but it is a clarification that normally is taken for granted or you forget to do for the thousand thoughts you have.
If, however, the material necessary to the discussion contains sensitive data is made present and does not publish it, if it has already been published and we realize that it contains sensitive data asks who must remove it.

believe that the forum manager, or who for him, checks every attachment or link to understand if it contains sensitive data, which most likely would not even evaluate, to remove or report them as dangerous is frankly science fiction; only I who attach a drawing can know whether the sensitive data is the name of the company or the design code or the reference to the supplier present on the cartiglio and therefore must be mine, and exclusively mine, premature to make it unrecognizable or not to attach it at all.

 

[meccanicamg]

In my opinion, I shall be discussing in general, but especially if the annex you have put has no secrets.
that on the network, not only on a forum, you should pay attention to what you publish should be, with all the privacy speeches and with all the social media that exist in the last 10/15 years, now discounted.
therefore, yes, the fault is totally of those who insert it because everyone is responsible for what binds and should have the ability to evaluate the delicacy of the data contained therein. Sometimes the interlocutors point out to eliminate sensitive data, but it is a clarification that normally is taken for granted or you forget to do for the thousand thoughts you have.
If, however, the material necessary to the discussion contains sensitive data is made present and does not publish it, if it has already been published and we realize that it contains sensitive data asks who must remove it.

believe that the forum manager, or who for him, checks every attachment or link to understand if it contains sensitive data, which most likely would not even evaluate, to remove or report them as dangerous is frankly science fiction; only I who attach a drawing can know whether the sensitive data is the name of the company or the design code or the reference to the supplier present on the cartiglio and therefore must be mine, and exclusively mine, premature to make it unrecognizable or not to attach it at all.

It seems so elementary.
and ...the title has no relevance with the request of the applicant. Bah.

 

[andrea1974]

I didn't know the title to put... It doesn't matter. .