powermill and small quarries with insert brake

[sseldiablo]

Good morning.

I hope to solve the problem, since I can't get out of it.
I happen to fresare a block and for reasons of time I am forced to use a cutter to inserts that obviously does not eat centrally.
the problem arises when we have to work small quarries of little greater than the mill, for example if I use a mill with inserts of 25 and the quarry is of 26 the cursed goes straight down and leaves the witness centrally, wrapped risk of damaging the mill besides the fact that it remains of the material that for the software, obviously does not exist.
is it possible to tell powermill to avoid x-size quarries so as to avoid these situations?
thanks in advance and good day.

 

[cimaguy]

Good morning.

I hope to solve the problem, since I can't get out of it.
I happen to fresare a block and for reasons of time I am forced to use a cutter to inserts that obviously does not eat centrally.
the problem arises when we have to work small quarries of little greater than the mill, for example if I use a mill with inserts of 25 and the quarry is of 26 the cursed goes straight down and leaves the witness centrally, wrapped risk of damaging the mill besides the fact that it remains of the material that for the software, obviously does not exist.
is it possible to tell powermill to avoid x-size quarries so as to avoid these situations?
thanks in advance and good day.

hi ..premetto that I am not a powermill expert, but I believe that every cam you respect should have a parameter (which on toptron is called "min.diam. of entry") that prevents the tool from entering too narrow areas just to avoid the situations you describe. I would therefore look for, among the various parameters to be set in the processing, a similar voice that surely exists

 

[filippo b]

Of course there is the function. We'd miss more.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Of course there is the function. We'd miss more.

compliments for the answer. This is the right spirit of the forum, be beg for a solution. chapeau!!! !
you are introducing new levels of squalor

 

[marcof]

compliments for the answer. This is the right spirit of the forum, be beg for a solution. chapeau!!! !
you are introducing new levels of squalor

Rotafl! is trying to distract in the forum to figure out where the iban should fit so that users can make the transfer for advice.

you should see the other message today where he responds to renaissance that explains that he has a certain data transmission problem with a milling machine telling him that:
"is a problem to be solved because it does not constitute the norm"

we must ask for the appointment as supervisor of the help and faq functions of the new site in preparation. :wink:

 

[filippo b]

I certainly do not claim that two Cadists understand powermill's technicians and, therefore, understand why an answer (at least on my part) cannot be articulated if, in the question, the essential information is missing.
what I demand is not to be object of illation about alleged compensation that I would be looking for. I don't know if it's your rule to look for your hand for the nonsense you say, my no certainly.
I gladly leave the word to those who can formulate solutions without questions.
to the author of the discussion I would suggest to implement the application with information on the working cycle used (grossing 3d, z constant, profiling 2d etc) so that you can receive the required help.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

both that marcof that I are two users who are banging in four to answer questions in deficit, dismissed, sgrammated and how much worse the user can write.
here it is not technical, but an answer that does not serve the user or the forum. is simple good use of the forum.
If the question is free of information, as unfortunately happens in the norm, the information necessary to give a valid answer or to direct reasoning in a given direction should be requested.
to say

Of course there is the function. We'd miss more.

Let me point out that the problem has been circumscribed and the answer already has it.

I don't know if it's your rule to look for your hand for the nonsense you say, my no certainly.

both marcof and I have thousands of posts behind us where we sometimes let ourselves go face-to-face, but it's enough to spulciate a little to read how many rhymes we solved. So accusing ourselves of nonsense is definitely out of place.

I gladly leave the word to those who can formulate solutions without questions.

that was also done; don't worry that the seer's mouth is in many to have it polished until exhaustion.

to the author of the discussion I would suggest to implement the application with information on the working cycle used (grossing 3d, z constant, profiling 2d etc) so that you can receive the required help.

this must be said immediately and not with a non-response that the user can certainly not interpret as a request in that sense.

 

[cimaguy]

I think the question was clear and he didn't need a lot of disappointment because the problem, for whom I plan, is quite known.
If one, then, wants to answer ....responds .if not, point..the spirit is to help those who ask, without making "superiors".

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

even who asks the question and in a month does not find 5 minutes to answer has his faults.

 

[filippo b]

both that marcof that I are two users who are banging in four to answer questions in deficit, dismissed, sgrammated and how much worse the user can write.
here it is not technical, but an answer that does not serve the user or the forum. is simple good use of the forum.
If the question is free of information, as unfortunately happens in the norm, the information necessary to give a valid answer or to direct reasoning in a given direction should be requested.
Let me say that the problem has been circumscribed and the answer already has it.

to each one's role, I am very pleased that there are users like you who give themselves to do for others. I mean it. The same applies to me, although obviously the commitment we put in this area is not equivalent.

both marcof and I have thousands of posts behind us where we sometimes let ourselves go face-to-face, but it's enough to spulciate a little to read how many rhymes we solved. So accusing ourselves of nonsense is definitely out of place.

I agree with you, absolutely deprecatable as should be deprecable the attachment received by the writer.

that was also done; don't worry that the seer's mouth is in many to have it polished until exhaustion.

I'll keep in mind! but I leave this role to others.

this must be said immediately and not with a non-response that the user can certainly not interpret as a request in that sense.

I'll keep this in mind.

even who asks the question and in a month does not find 5 minutes to answer has his faults.

This is fully shared and agrees with me.

I think the question was clear and he didn't need a lot of disappointment because the problem, for whom I plan, is quite known.
If one, then, wants to answer ....responds .if not, point..the spirit is to help those who ask, without making "superiors".

the question still seems unresponsive; You can give it to her, I don't think anyone will stop you.

Greetings to everyone.

 

[cimaguy]

to each one's role, I am very pleased that there are users like you who give themselves to do for others. I mean it. The same applies to me, although obviously the commitment we put in this area is not equivalent.


I agree with you, absolutely deprecatable as should be deprecable the attachment received by the writer.


I'll keep in mind! but I leave this role to others.


I'll keep this in mind.


This is fully shared and agrees with me.


the question still seems unresponsive; You can give it to her, I don't think anyone will stop you.

Greetings to everyone.

I think I was the first to answer. . I invite you to reread my answer

 

[luma80]

Yes yes can do is a percentage value.
I don't remember what's written tomorrow.

 

[luma80]

go to the page remove unsafe segments.
active : remove smaller segments of the threshold
and enter the value

 

[bulinorotto]

In case of roughing the parameter is the area filter and is expressed in tdu( tool diameter unit) that means that if I put 1 and the cut is 63 my parameter is 1=63.
a consensus when asking a question try to briefly describe the general picture.
qs parameter is present in many processes and is used differently