prevalence beams on walls

[Putrella]

Good morning to all, I have a problem with revit that I believe to be simple visualization. I have in the model of the reinforced concrete walls on which, at the various levels, are placed beams in thickness that act as a crowning of the wall (they are like the enlargements of the head of the wall in correspondence of the loft, of the full armed bands as a beam). in the views, both flat and assonometric, I see the wall that crosses the beam in question, while in the visualization I would like the opposite, that is that the wall interrupted under the beam and to the variation of this variasse also the wall. Is there a possibility to set this prevalence between beams and wall in views?
Thank you.

 

[Tristan]

Are the walls structural?

 

[Putrella]

Yes, the model has been made without considering the complete wall package and therefore it is composed by the only skeleton..setti, beams and pillars. for now I am approaching the use of revit only using the structural parts..so that for many it is a blasphemy to use the bim in this way, but somewhere I had to start!! :wink::wink:

 

[Tristan]

for now I am approaching the use of revit only using the structural parts..so that for many it is a blasphemy to use the bim in this way.. .

Why? each design for what concerns the following discipline. Why do you have to put in the systems if you don't know a snitch? do it to those who understand:wink:
However, if you used structural components the beams should have "fused" with the sets below. Didn't happen to you?

 

[Putrella]

Yes, they are fused, but you see the passing sect up to the level and the beam that is cut...I would like the upper level of the wall to stop under the intradox of the beam leaving it graphically continuous, so that you have a plant in which you see the continuous beams and the trace of the wall hidden below.
I put an image hoping you will understand.thank you very much in any case for the participation

 

[Tristan]

you have at least two ways: 1) change the order of the joints; 2) align the top of the wall with the intradox of the beam. There would be a third that provides for the creation of an additional level under the one currently used to make the top of the walls arrive

 

[Putrella]

with the function "change the order of the joints" you have turned me the day! ! ! !
I would say it was just what I was looking for... still gives me some trouble with various holes that leave here and there but it is absolutely what I needed.
Thank you 1000.. .