volaff
Guest
hello guys do you know or use some meshless structural analysis program?
How are they?
How are they?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
biz
Guest
simsolid, a product altar.
If you don't have to do "up to" analysis is great.
there is implemented the method of external approximations, to make it short.
or there is discovery, an ansys product, I tried it and, in my opinion, it is not up to symsolid.
I should have some white paper around. Monday, maybe I'll look at you and I'll show you.
If you don't have to do "up to" analysis is great.
there is implemented the method of external approximations, to make it short.
or there is discovery, an ansys product, I tried it and, in my opinion, it is not up to symsolid.
I should have some white paper around. Monday, maybe I'll look at you and I'll show you.
biz
Guest
there is also meshfree of midas
mastraa
Guest
I create for some time has implemented livesimulation, it is developed by ansys for which perhaps comes from discovery, but I don't know.
if I have not understood bad goes to use a kind of grid created by the graphics card for viewing, in fact need of graphics cards of a certain level to turn.
In general I don't like it, I don't directly deal with fem analysis at work being there a dedicated group, but also for those four preliminary simulations that I have to use the complete simulate. Unfortunately at the moment the commands are still very limited in the choice. It's really done to get a maximum idea of what's going on, but you can't even shape the constraints of average complexity. Of course I don't think it's a problem of the kind of solutor as much as the ptc choice.
in fact for those few comparative tests that by curiosity I did the results were very similar to the simulated.
if I have not understood bad goes to use a kind of grid created by the graphics card for viewing, in fact need of graphics cards of a certain level to turn.
In general I don't like it, I don't directly deal with fem analysis at work being there a dedicated group, but also for those four preliminary simulations that I have to use the complete simulate. Unfortunately at the moment the commands are still very limited in the choice. It's really done to get a maximum idea of what's going on, but you can't even shape the constraints of average complexity. Of course I don't think it's a problem of the kind of solutor as much as the ptc choice.
in fact for those few comparative tests that by curiosity I did the results were very similar to the simulated.
biz
Guest
I tried discovery but didn't satisfy me. values were distant from those extracted from fem analysis with convergence tests.I create for some time has implemented livesimulation, it is developed by ansys for which perhaps comes from discovery, but I don't know.
if I have not understood bad goes to use a kind of grid created by the graphics card for viewing, in fact need of graphics cards of a certain level to turn.
In general I don't like it, I don't directly deal with fem analysis at work being there a dedicated group, but also for those four preliminary simulations that I have to use the complete simulate. Unfortunately at the moment the commands are still very limited in the choice. It's really done to get a maximum idea of what's going on, but you can't even shape the constraints of average complexity. Of course I don't think it's a problem of the kind of solutor as much as the ptc choice.
in fact for those few comparative tests that by curiosity I did the results were very similar to the simulated.
simsolid is good.