project with guided quotas

[BFausto]

Hi.

It seems ok even if using only creo I have no comparison terms.

 

[BFausto]

Hi.

However, you have to use a few tricks to keep the views in place properly oriented that during regeneration (see helical section) may vary.

 

[BFausto]

Hi.

I posted a new one on:https://youtu.be/bqh_71xk04eI hope I don't stew.
even on this table the difficult thing was to keep developments in a correct position.

 

[320i S]

It's been 15 minutes, so I'm gonna add here.

I said,

If you want to use the notes, there is a discussion here:
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/5308-quote-guidate-da-noteBut in the end it depends a lot on the type of product we design. an example is who designs cylinders: it is the typical set that is really worth parameterizing because to pull out a family of products after it is really a moment. If the project is a prototype it is useless to push the parameterization thoroughly.

another thing I have seen that it is useful is to strive to organize the asses before even pulling a single line: to understand what to put in the main skeleton, to understand if in addition to the axioms it is best to make "subscheleters". the fault of this methodology is that if the boss ("el paron") does not know a blessed bat of how to use a parametric and does not see you draw "tochi" sooner or later the line ("poche saws and drills the blind drawings") you hunt it because it does not understand that the half day you lose to understand how to organize the aid in reality is not lost, it is something that makes you earn with interest and makes the project possible.

the first question to be asked is whether the project is fine to itself (committed that regardless of the number of pieces, it will remain such and which or otherwise will live of own life), or it is industrial with optimization codes and costs for a product life or family of products of a certain importance.
In this last case, dependencies, inheritance etc. are counterproductive in the changes, it is likely to carry itself behind obsolete components, because those still active cannot "exist" without the obsolete.
a series of complications and a number of data, not indifferent and worse hair, is likely to re-enter the obsolete in the production flow.

so think about what you do uphill.

 

[BFausto]

Hi.

I have grouped the three examples here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/uca1rn27su0jj3n-ghh2hbtg

 

[BFausto]

Hi.
I opened a new channel of creo and freecad demonstrations:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/uckyltjkqxosalyexux_amdawhere I inserted a last video series I create very interesting:

idea question of the debate:

https://community.ptc.com/t5/3d-par...-3d-cam-roller-pattern-and-timing/td-p/746218