Michael
Guest
Good morning.
It is the first time I write in a forum, so excuse me at the start if I commit some involuntary error.
currently use pro/e wf4 with intralink 3.4 m070.
on a specific intralink library folder bets my config.pro regarding materials libraries.
from a few days I noticed that proe calculates the mass of my parts incorrectly.
For example, the steel material density of about 7.8e-06 kg/mm^3 has become 7.8e-11 kg/mm^3.
all this seemed strange to me for two reasons:
1) the file on which the system bets is not editable by users
2) because the variation from "e-06" to "e-11" has been propagated to all the materials present in the library.
ptc assistance was only able to confirm that the permitted range for mass density values is between 10 and 10.
I would have personally considered the hypothesis that some "arch" parameter of proes has been modified which affects the density value.
confide in vs. experience
Thank you.
greetings
Michael
It is the first time I write in a forum, so excuse me at the start if I commit some involuntary error.
currently use pro/e wf4 with intralink 3.4 m070.
on a specific intralink library folder bets my config.pro regarding materials libraries.
from a few days I noticed that proe calculates the mass of my parts incorrectly.
For example, the steel material density of about 7.8e-06 kg/mm^3 has become 7.8e-11 kg/mm^3.
all this seemed strange to me for two reasons:
1) the file on which the system bets is not editable by users
2) because the variation from "e-06" to "e-11" has been propagated to all the materials present in the library.
ptc assistance was only able to confirm that the permitted range for mass density values is between 10 and 10.
I would have personally considered the hypothesis that some "arch" parameter of proes has been modified which affects the density value.
confide in vs. experience
Thank you.
greetings
Michael