bigsnake
Guest
Hello, everyone.
some time ago I opened a discussion about the "automatic regenerate".
I make a small summary: I have a part with more than 1500 features with conflicts I can't solve. so not to crash the system during the "automatic regenerate" of the asmby, I must use the "read only" option to make static features that I will not redefine anymore, and exclude them from regeneration.
Okay, this works and you gave me a great deal!! !
the problem now comes to me in the "part" (and no more "assembly").
always considering the same component mentioned above, to which I already put about 1300 features on 1500 read only: any face redefinition of the features at the bottom of the tree, even the last, and even the stupidest, like changing a share of the sketch, given ok to the sketcher begins the calculation from feature 1.
I repeat: the file certainly has conflicts, I would like to understand why the regeneration in assembly the calculation begins me from feature 1300, while in the part the calculation starts me from feature 1.
Do you know any tricks to get over the problem?? ? ?
some time ago I opened a discussion about the "automatic regenerate".
I make a small summary: I have a part with more than 1500 features with conflicts I can't solve. so not to crash the system during the "automatic regenerate" of the asmby, I must use the "read only" option to make static features that I will not redefine anymore, and exclude them from regeneration.
Okay, this works and you gave me a great deal!! !
the problem now comes to me in the "part" (and no more "assembly").
always considering the same component mentioned above, to which I already put about 1300 features on 1500 read only: any face redefinition of the features at the bottom of the tree, even the last, and even the stupidest, like changing a share of the sketch, given ok to the sketcher begins the calculation from feature 1.
I repeat: the file certainly has conflicts, I would like to understand why the regeneration in assembly the calculation begins me from feature 1300, while in the part the calculation starts me from feature 1.
Do you know any tricks to get over the problem?? ? ?