rendering scadente

[dicifa]

hello to all... new problem...:biggrin:

...I need to create renderings of machinery that I designed and need to make color prints on a2 in high definition to show the final customer in the meetings we do, the problem is that when I mold the images are all geared. Can you tell me why?

 

[Fulvio Romano]

Low resolution?
for a good photo print never go under the 300dpi. This means that an a2 that is 16,5 x 23 inches, the resolution must be at least 4950x6900

then, if you print to emulsion. You better get up to 500dpi.

 

[Ilario]

Low resolution?
for a good photo print never go under the 300dpi. This means that an a2 that is 16,5 x 23 inches, the resolution must be at least 4950x6900

then, if you print to emulsion. You better get up to 500dpi.

Yes, in principle reasoning is right, but there is a sort of theoretical "law" that is also based on the distance from which you see the image (repeat, theoretical but functional as it allows, thinking that the greater the sheet is greater you will see from far away, to print to lower resolutions and therefore saving time and with already acceptable quality).

without entering into theoretical formulas I can tell you that for an a2 already make to 4092x2893 printing 175dpi you can already have good results.

 

[dicifa]

I'm not there yet. .

when I make the rendering imposed width 1024 x height 768, I start and then save as tiff with 300 dpi... what's wrong?

 

[Ilario]

that 1024x768 to 300dpi corresponds to an image from 8.5cm to 6.5cm if then the molds in a2 to whole sheet clear.

render to 4092x2893 and save to 175dpi, print (always to 175dpi) and then let us know

However, the mistake lies in thinking about 1024x768 as a "high" resolution. actually it is, but only for video views that do not go beyond 72dpi. for printing resolutions are much higher.

 

[dicifa]

Okay, I'll try and let you know. . .

but what do you establish that 1024x768 to 300dpi corresponds to an image from 8.5cm to 6.5cm?

 

[Ilario]

You know what dpi are?
dpi, is per dot per inch = pixel per inch, so with a small calculation if you know that in an inch there are 300 pixels, it is easy to know the size for each side

 

[dicifa]

I am! I figured out how to calculate everything...

....I do rendering and you actually see it is 100 times better, only thing that will take more time but little interest me. .

As soon as mold we see how it comes out...

Great Ilario!!!:36_1_11:

 

[Ilario]

even fulvio gave you the right advice, eh... I just specified. . .

 

[dicifa]

You're right. .

...large both of you!!! !

just mold I tell you how the print comes out.. .

Thank you.

 

[Fulvio Romano]

....I do rendering and you actually see it is 100 times better, only thing that will take more time but little interest me. .

we say it takes a x4 time each time the side of the sheet doubles. . .

And yet I'm sure I've already written these things somewhere. and if I remember well ilario prayed. But I can't find that discussion.

 

[PabloPicasso]

I take advantage of this discussion to ask if any of you use different software from inventor for rendering.

to me it seems (but I might be wrong) that the inventor module is not the maximum and I don't think you can get results similar to those for example of corn or 3ds max.

who makes professional renderings, usually exports from inventor to any of these programs?

 

[Ilario]

Yes, I for max use. If you own both max and inventor on the same machine, you can import with max .iam or .ipt files of inventor directly.

 

[MBT]

had given me a trial version of autodesk showcasehttp://www.autodesk.it/adsk/servlet/pc/index?siteid=457036&id=15019116I seemed rather sympathetic and powerful, but I had no time to deepen

 

[Daniele_69]

I seemed rather sympathetic and powerful, but I had no time to deepen

It's autodesk software to make. It's not immediate in commands, but the results are really fantastic: I don't know if anyone has been to this year's user meeting, but it has been tested with a demo by an azimut technician.
Hi.