marcof
Guest
Try to see this discussion if it can help you.http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=18780&highlight=ripetizionep.s....mad: ... (no comment)
Have you ever seen anything like that in the annex?
set the path, then the body or function to repeat and sw does it, but as it seems to him... as if it was on another floor (which then does not even exist. . )
how did you solve this?
However, swx has it with you." ..pirsonally pirsona" [cit.] :biggrin:
reggio
Guest
Thanks, interesting
I would say it's official! ! !
for the record: done everything exactly like last night and now it works... : eek: ...disarmante. . .
...instead of not (not even time to finish this post and again a new error) as the "michione" instead of always repeating outside, makes it half and half...
to the tray an offset of the path, and I put the sketch of the part above, I try to repeat: nothing to do, it teases me, the preview shows me but then it does not perform anything... and the triangle of errors suggests me to use the bodies but in the function I do not find... :36_1_15: so I'm boss ...
...we see if the assistance helps me. .
ps: When we meet so you pour out your infinite experience (and I invest you with my 1000 unresolved and suspicious problems...)?
Attachments
sampom
Guest
Mike1967
Guest
hi reggio, I don't understand what you want to repeat 500 times. . ....
Have you ever seen anything like that in the annex?
set the path, then the body or function to repeat and sw does it, but as it seems to him... as if it was on another floor (which then does not even exist. . )
how did you solve this?
you can make a small example, maybe creating a set with 2-3 repetitions
What do you mean?
Maybe with all those repetitions the functions overlap and conflict.
Hi.
Mike1967
Guest
Fremposta
Guest
Good evening.
I add small example.
from what I have seen from the pictures just play with the options and should work, the image with the error is due to the repetition of the function and not of the bodies, it would be appropriate to check the function join result and then repeat the bodies.
a greeting to all
I add small example.
from what I have seen from the pictures just play with the options and should work, the image with the error is due to the repetition of the function and not of the bodies, it would be appropriate to check the function join result and then repeat the bodies.
a greeting to all
marcof
Guest
he is not unlucky, it is only that by force of complaining of swx because he cannot automatically do not even the jackets at the cross point for the mannequins to use in the assembly, the software turns against him, but he does it only to him:tongue:. . .
marcof
Guest
We can meet whenever you want, but you have to give me some notice that I turn off the pc and take it to my bank vault. You know, I don't want swx, notoriously vengeful to those who stress him too much, to know that I frequent you and for retaliation he behaved with me as he does with you. :hahahah:
you either overestimate me or take me for the cuxo... or both options together.
the appointment is, as usual for the cad3d visitors, at 07:00 outside the toll of modena nord :tongue:
reggio
Guest
...I won't be surprised;p
I would never allow myself!
Yeah? Really? maybe at a time + decent from the...
reggio
Guest
...in previous posts I could seize a very veiled form of irony... :tongue:
So to put things back a little bit in equal terms ... ;p
0) swx is not a free open surce software. . .
1) the initial function I solved it by doing the sketch on the opposite point of the path and now (pare) functions all...
2) since the project was not finished I continued with swx and with obviously last problems of which what you find in attachment, solved only with a meschino makeup to deliver the project, but that remains unresolved mystery (the stools together, should not fly but follow the set path). .
ps: you do not respond in case of PC fusion or retaliation by sw!
So to put things back a little bit in equal terms ... ;p
0) swx is not a free open surce software. . .
1) the initial function I solved it by doing the sketch on the opposite point of the path and now (pare) functions all...
2) since the project was not finished I continued with swx and with obviously last problems of which what you find in attachment, solved only with a meschino makeup to deliver the project, but that remains unresolved mystery (the stools together, should not fly but follow the set path). .
ps: you do not respond in case of PC fusion or retaliation by sw!
Attachments
marcof
Guest
I can't open the attachment, I still have 2009 and 2010, for security, I will install it only when you're gone to 2011:tongue:
Other jokes, these are bugs that must be reported with so much file and procedure to repeat them, since you can
Mike1967
Guest
with your part you used to repeat doesn't even work to me, but then I designed ex novo the bearing function and it's all fixed.
remember that the repetition you do in the part you use to place the
Stools, must reflect the finished result of what you want to achieve.
note the cut I made on the position "path 1).
that allows you to "see" the rotation of the object compared to the path.
I'll get you the file.
Hi.
Attachments
re_solidworks
Guest
then at this point it is official: the software turns against him!
Mike1967
Guest
...yes, sires, it seems to me that until now all his disfactionist and "calunnious" interventions (it is done to say... ehhh:smile
on this magnificent software have been dismantled by the solutions posted
from different users, including me.
perhaps, reggio, you should have more confidence in a sw whose limit is
the ability of the user (do not break, I am the first to have
of limits..lol).
...
reggio
Guest
Uhmm disagree, the vast majority of requests passed before in "assistance" and then here, they have not been resolute (you do not misunderstand me, it is not a challenge and even less does not want to be a kind of offense to you that daily you damn to help us disperate impediments and incompetents - even if, qlc wanted to rival the old things would do nothing but a great pleasure). ....yes, sires, it seems to me that until now all his disfactionist and "calunnious" interventions (it is done to say... ehhh:smile
on this magnificent software have been dismantled by the solutions posted
from different users, including me.
perhaps, reggio, you should have more confidence in a sw whose limit is
the ability of the user (do not break, I am the first to have
of limits..lol).
...
to finish I have another driving path, created like all the other driving routes I have done here, but that, again this time, it behaves at c@#o of c#@e...
Attachments
reggio
Guest
...the problem is that with different routes ex novo also to me (usually) but I want to do just that path and there is no reason that I should not.. .
now I am retrying and retrying but continues to make c@##its :36_1_15: and I do not find the way to do it, except to use the trick of repeating itself in the part... but it is not the correct solution.. .
Mike1967
Guest
No one forbids you....
reggio, probably the part file you are using for
I don't know what he's got.
I did nothing but copy your sketch
copying it to a new part file of trinca.
try repeating with a new file and then tell me.
Hi.
Mike1967
Guest
... do you think they know all the variables possible and unimaginable?? ?
I don't think so.
I, already 10 months ago asked explanations regarding the multibody in sheet metal (which not
It works, at least it's highly unreliable... it doesn't work...) and still today I haven't had an answer... do a little yourself.
I, if I were you, would listen more to those who live "on the field" daily
These problems.
.
However, you are perfectly right, I read now in your avatar that you also use autocad, of course
accustomed to that "player" it is hard to lower to use solidworks... :biggrin:
Mike1967
Guest
What, exactly, are the unsolved problems of these 3Ds??? ? ? ?http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=22145http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=22050http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=19438http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20834http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20555http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20430http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20174http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=18689http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=18388http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=18294http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17923http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17602http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17482http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17051http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17518http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=16113http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=15666http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=12795http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=13447 < < < < ) this is mythical, now I understand the assistance :36_6_4:. .
bye: