repetition region with very special filters

[cingolo]

hello to all
You are my only hope! I have to make a region of repetition for such a structured basic distinction (which seems like an analysis problem that more a design):
I have a set containing parts called 11233 23545 58755 25479 and so on...
When I'm at the table doing the distnta with a repetition region I'd like that (without touching parts parameters!) filter the parts according to the following logic:

-The parts with the name starting with the number 1 in the basic distinction will be called screws

-The parts with the name starting with number 2 in the basic distinction will be called dice
(without touching parts parameters!)I hope I've explained well

thanks to who will answer me

 

[cingolo]

I have to admit that I fell into reproposing a problem that has already been faced in a previous post of lollon and solved. I apologize to everyone for posting without first looking in the forum (pigrity of those who care to want answers quickly without deepening). returning to the problem I solved by adding in my reetition region a column that I defined comments with the menu management. In this way I can write the name I want without any trace in the parameters. I will soon post all the steps that led me to the solution.
Sorry again!

 

[lollone]

Sorry about the curiosity. . .
Can you put the link of my post in which I asked for help for a similar problem? I don't remember and I can't find him. . .
only by curiosity.... memory is not my strong point!! !
Hi.

 

[cingolo]

Hello, Lollone!
Sorry if I didn't answer right away, the link to your post is this:
http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=17436and that's exactly what I wanted to do at the end, I got complicated at the beginning but then I saw that you could go with this method, i.e. I explain better.
I have normal and parts whose parameters are "immaculate" trouble to those who touch them (due to a shared use with other colleagues) so I have problems creating an automatic distinction, I took the cue from your post or write "hand" the data, in my case the material and the name, but leaving the parameter of the code and the file name. I then added to the material columns and denomination with the command "comments" thus having a precise association between the lines. not if it is a good solution but using it for the first 2 days I found myself well, what do you think?

 

[lollone]

I don't know what your working method is. . .
But I can tell you that for example I took a step back from my post.
I found another solution for everything to go out automatically.
use software like pro-e must reduce time and error possibilities.
in my opinion managing data to "manina" can be a problem or can lead to errors.I am always willing to make sure that, if possible, everything comes out automatically.
Maybe you should talk to your colleagues and make sure you create parameters that allow you to have all the information you need.
I tell you why I found myself in a situation for which I pushed to see the whole company historian, and I created all new configurations for the pro-e. from the parameters to the config, from the start to the masses on the table.practically we changed way of working (helped by the fact that until that time the pro-e was used only as autocad support software). a hard job but now it's all easier.
cmq the material you can automatically release it in the table if in the part you impose it, and then recall it in table (ptc_material_name).
Let me know and if you need a hand or advice, I always find myself here.
Hi.
♪

 

[cingolo]

I also proposed to my company to review the parameters, but unfortunately I was rejected of course because I am the only one who has to work with this method and I cannot uniform myself to the company standard (just because it has always been so). Is there a method to filter or impose relationships (such as if ) in repetition regions?

 

[lollone]

but how do they usually manage material and description then?or are parameters that usually do not interest them?
I never tried to adjust with if etc...
I try tomorrow and I know you!

 

[cingolo]

my colleagues who do not belong to my office have the following distinct with the relative parameters integrated to the model tree:

n°particular | parity | qta | material |

parameter naming_particular
Material parameter
normal parameter

the normalities we use in the company are family tables so called es:

dado1234.prt where the naming_part parameter. is e.g. dado uni 5588 m20

I should have a distinct like:

n°particular | denomination | qta | material | surface treatment | surface protection | normal |

But I was not allowed to change my bubble or to have been added some parameters for me.
once I was hand-differentiated (it reminded me of the good times of the school with the tecnigraph), it is not how it finally came out.

 

[cingolo]

first I made a mistake:

n°particular | parity | qta | material |

Material parameter
normal parameter (which goes to write in the particular name column)

 

[lollone]

If you don't get the chance to add parameters, you only have the possibility to insert data into a handle!

 

[cingolo]

I for the material column use the usual parameter, only thing is that the normal parameter to me corresponds in the normal column. I thought I'd leave the name column defined as comments to write by hand. What do you think?

 

[lollone]

I don't know how you work and what you really need.
but what you say is the only solution!
Or do you think of others?

 

[cingolo]

no I didn't think of any more, I opted for the solution that I had conceived at the beginning as I was not allowed neither to go for parameters nor that the pdm, a repeating region so composed:
n°particular | denomination | qta | material | surface treatment | surface protection | normal |

to each column so structured with the parameters present on the pdm:

the name column made by hand through the comment command
Material parameter
normal parameter (which goes to write in normal column)
surface treatment parameter
parameter surface protection

only thing slightly uncomfortable is to have to write each time the name column, I will attach the tebella as soon as possible.

 

[blubossa]

I would like to create a filter on a repeat table that would show me

the parts that
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I used this syntax but it goes wrong:
== yes

Any suggestions? ?

Thank you.
bb

 

[wired]

I would like to create a filter on a repeat table that would show me

the parts that
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I used this syntax but it goes wrong:
== yes

Any suggestions? ?

Thank you.
bb

by memory.. .
remove a pipe
== yes

or use only one =
or put the ; instead of ,
...
test

 

[arni1]

can be solved with relationships in the region of repetition:
(the example is only for the name of details)
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)!="1"| extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)!="2"
name=asm_mbr_name
endif
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)="1"
name="vite"
endif
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)="2"
name="dado"
endif
then in the table you make a new column and write in
&rpt.rel.nome
so is the other parameters. . .
the parameters of the details remain equal... .

Hi.
hinges

 

[blubossa]

by memory.. .
remove a pipe
== yes

or use only one =
or put the ; instead of ,
...
test

provato, non funziona:frown::frown:

 

[blubossa]

can be solved with relationships in the region of repetition:
(the example is only for the name of details)
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)!="1"| extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)!="2"
name=asm_mbr_name
endif
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)="1"
name="vite"
endif
if extract (asm_mbr_name,1,1)="2"
name="dado"
endif
then in the table you make a new column and write in
&rpt.rel.nome
so is the other parameters. . .
the parameters of the details remain equal... .

Hi.
hinges

good idea, it works.... .
Do you have any idea how to use realations within a drw? ?

Thank you.
bb

 

[arni1]

depends on what you would like to do with a drw's internal relations.

Hi.
hinges

 

[blubossa]

depends on what you would like to do with a drw's internal relations.

Hi.
hinges

really having never used them inside a drw I wanted to understand what you can do so I wanted some examples of reference. :wink:

Thank you.
bb