resulting on 2 body

[Nic65]

Good morning.
I have a solid cylinder with a cavity. the cavity must become protruding on a plate (always solid). I managed to get the result represented in the images below by getting the surfaces from the cavity and sewing them on the plate. I kindly ask if someone knows the possibility of obtaining the same result through operations that do not oblige me to use surfaces.
Thank you in advance.
Hi:

 

[falonef]

Have you tried Boolean operations?

 

[Nic65]

I can't find the right command (if it exists).

 

[ferrezio]

If I do not take the form, I will do it così.

cation

 

[stef_design]

Have you tried Boolean operations?

giusto:finger:

 

[stef_design]

If I do not take the form, I will do it così.

cation

hi ferrezio, out of curiosity, why did you create a sketch placed in the last body?
Hi:

 

[ferrezio]

hi ferrezio, out of curiosity, why did you create a sketch placed in the last body?
Hi:

For me it is a habit to work with the sketches placed, I do not use the standard sketches to avoid dependencies with the absolute reference system also, I can orientate the viewpoint of the sketch plan.

Hi.

 

[Nic65]

Sorry, I didn't explain myself well. What you did is right, okay. but not unfortunately for my case. and I try to explain (I hope a little better this time).
I've simplified the plate model, it's actually a lot more complex than a prism, so it's impossible to increase it thick and then subtract the second model.
The plate is the main model. the cylinder is a secondary model also he is not so simple (they are 22 coolers with irregular geometry that must be placed on a plate). These coolers are on another model and are published. the procedure I have to follow is "special copy/paste" cooler on the plate and be able to make a protrusion on the plate that is precisely a cavity on the cooler.
I also tried with the command "remove padded" by deleting the faces that do not serve, but as a result only the plate appears.

I hoped that by overlapping two body with matching faces there was precisely the possibility to make one protrude on one that is cavity on the other (even by joining them previously, I can do this).

Now that I've been in more detail, do you have any ideas? I thank you very much for the answers given to me.:smile:
Hi.

 

[stef_design]

can you post the model??

 

[Nic65]

I would do it willingly but unfortunately I would risk falling into sations. possibly I can send the model if you have time and want to try:smile:

 

[Mocca]

in this situation I proceed in this way:
1st in the most complex part (that dominant between the 2 details that I believe is the plate) I create a new "body" that will contain the part that will have to grow in the plate and be emptied in the cylinder.
2nd working in context mode (in assembly) I make a copy-paste with result, of the previously created body, from plate to cylinder
3rd in the plate I carry out a boolean operation of sum between the plate itself and the body created
4th in the cylinder I carry out a boolean operation of subtraction between the cylinder and the body copied.
with this mode you always have the 2 parametric objects and washed between them.
Good job.

 

[biricio]

in this situation I proceed in this way:
1st in the most complex part (that dominant between the 2 details that I believe is the plate) I create a new "body" that will contain the part that will have to grow in the plate and be emptied in the cylinder.

I don't know if nic65 has the "part that will grow in the plate" or if you want to get it? I think the second option

 

[Mocca]

It can be as you say. if you have previously worked with the body you can use them for Boolean operations as an alternative you will have to create a new body that will be the negative of the cylinder (only the part that will grow in the plate) through alternating Boolean operations.
the goal is always the same: if one form will grow in one part and be excavated in another will have to work forcefully with body and boolean in contextual mode.
greetings

 

[ferrezio]

see if it can go.
having the r19 the procedure would be faster because then create parts together with links.

Hi.

 

[Nic65]

the part that has to grow in the plate I have to get it and the customer does not allow any intervention on the model of "cilindri".
I'm allowed to work on the plate, yes, importing cylinders with special copy/paste.
at this point it would also be simple to create a prisma combined with the plate that covers the part to get and then subtract the copied cylinder. but I was looking for a more immediate command, dedicated to this kind of operation. It's so big that sometimes you're looking for non-existent commands. Maybe this is one of those times.
Thank you very much for your answers.

 

[Nic65]

see if it can go.
having the r19 the procedure would be faster because then create parts together with links.

Hi.

Exhaust and look at immediately, thanks :smile:

 

[falonef]

For me it is a habit to work with the sketches placed, I do not use the standard sketches to avoid dependencies with the absolute reference system also, I can orientate the viewpoint of the sketch plan.

Hi.

Exactly, we also use only the sketchers placed. there is more flexibility! ! !