• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

retinals in scale

  • Thread starter Thread starter saluzzidan
  • Start date Start date

saluzzidan

Guest
Bye to all,
I have a problem with the scale of a lattice of porphyry cubes.
If I load the retino as a drawing, I can give a scale factor of 100 and the size of the cubes are right.
if I load the retino as a model, the scale of 100 makes me see the cubes too small. I should climb them to 1000 but it makes me mistake because the scale factor is too big.

Is there a chance to resolve or leave?

Thank you.
Daniele
 
the size of the pattern motifs (nets) remains constant compared to the pattern and that of the design motifs remains constant compared to the table.

pattern patterns represent the real appearance of elements of a building, such as the brick course or tile of a wall, and are constant in relation to the model.

This means that they are directly proportional to the model, so, by changing the scale of the view, the reason is changed accordingly.

therefore, decreasing the scale (from 1:100 to 1:200) the retino regrets but remains proportional to the model (drawing), i.e. a rhombus pattern from 1 cm will always be 1 cm in any scale is measured, but visually shrinks

design motifs represent the materials in symbolic form; For example, sand is represented by a dot pattern. the density of design motifs is constant in relation to the drawing board.
therefore, increasing or decreasing the scale the size of the motif does not vary, i.e. a 1cm-scale roar pattern 1:100 will be 2 cm measured in scale 1:200, but visually remains equal

if you want to reduce or increase the size of the pattern pattern you need to prepare reasons for different sizes (depending on the various scales of representation), i.e.:
if I have to insert a pattern pattern to highlight (draw) a brick wall I have to use a brick pattern with vertical "pass" line 25 and horizontal "pass" 12 (cm 12 x 25)
Of course, if the scale of representation is 1: 100, the reason, visually, is "readable", if instead I use a scale of representation at 200, the reason "visually" is no longer legible (although correct in size in relation to the wall.
in such a case, to make "readable" the pattern in scale at 200, you must insert a pattern with cross lines from "pass" 24 x 50, visible, but not graphically correct
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top