revit 2010 or autocad architecture 2010 for masterplan with architectural parts

[blue.cat]

hello to all, I wanted a council on which of these two tools is more appropriate for a project that I am carrying out within a university workshop.
what I would like to achieve, given the very tight times, is to speed up the drawing work, exploiting views, sections and 3d generated by the software, drawing essentially in the plant.
the design area is extended, it is an entire area around a rail knot; Besides a masterplan I will have to define some design buildings, but the scale will not go beyond 1:100.
I redefine the choice to these two software because they are those used in faculty and are those that I can use with the student license.
the base of departure are drawings in autocad; I used revit 2009 in the past, but I wanted to completely eliminate the 2d passage in autocad-parametric revit. Given the extended scale I didn't want to generate too heavy files, so I thought about autocad architecture, but I never used it.
Can it be useful for you to "push" me on this program to speed up the job? better use autocad and revit?
thank you very much for the advice and apologize if I have been long.

 

[Aenil]

with revit if you do a little hand you usually manage to halve the productive times, I starting from scratch with this software in 2 weeks I practically completed the base of the project (plan. 3d sections, missing details, ferries, quotas and little more).
I'm using it for something similar to yours, and given the timing I decided to throw myself on revit.

the only mole are the files that often become very heavy(mb workshops) and the software heaviness in general.

personally the only thing I will do with autocad will be the constructive details that I will then matter in the 2011 revit board.

ps: if you are also enrolled on http://students.autodesk.com/ have recently put 2011 revit