gil
Guest
Hi.
during the demonstrations held at the fair I had these impressions, referring to the design of metal stunts.
<>revit structure works very well, in addition it interfaces with robot computing software which is a great thing. its disadvantage lies in the difficulty of using and intersamabire the elaborates with the "actual standard" autocad.
In short, it is a separate and different way compared to autocad, all ta reimparate.Also I ask you how you quarry with details, example generation of knots with bolts?
<> structural detailng instead, intergrates into atocad, the files interchange easily. makes beautiful executive details. However, it does not connect with any calculation program.
In short, it seems to me that structural detailng is more to do workshop details, revit for a complete structural anthropology. if one does both you have to arrange to buy both!
do these impress me with your experience / knowledge?
and if not, how do you exceed the limits I have underlined for the software under review?
during the demonstrations held at the fair I had these impressions, referring to the design of metal stunts.
<>revit structure works very well, in addition it interfaces with robot computing software which is a great thing. its disadvantage lies in the difficulty of using and intersamabire the elaborates with the "actual standard" autocad.
In short, it is a separate and different way compared to autocad, all ta reimparate.Also I ask you how you quarry with details, example generation of knots with bolts?
<> structural detailng instead, intergrates into atocad, the files interchange easily. makes beautiful executive details. However, it does not connect with any calculation program.
In short, it seems to me that structural detailng is more to do workshop details, revit for a complete structural anthropology. if one does both you have to arrange to buy both!
do these impress me with your experience / knowledge?
and if not, how do you exceed the limits I have underlined for the software under review?