revit vs revit lt

[giro_mary]

Hello, I am currently using the trial version of revit, but unfortunately the time is going to expire and I have to decide which version to buy, of course my wallet brings me to the lt, but I can not understand the differences well.

I looked at the comparison that he does on the autodesk site, but there are points that I do not know what they refer to, in particular:
- conceptual massing, adaptive components;
- shaped edited floors and roofs;
- global parameters;
- in-place modeling (walls only for revit lt).

If some good soul can help me understand what I will miss in the new purchase, so as not to find too many surprises... .
or if there are other important differences that I cannot understand, considering that I would use it for small architectural projects.

Thank you so far. :redface:
Mary

 

[Tristan]

mainly revit lt has nothing relative to the mep discipline and the structure part very resized (no beam systems, reticolari beams, strengthening) and does not have the integrated rendering module. for what concerns your questions it is difficult to explain in a post, in voice, the features indicated by you. Have you already made a trip on youtube?

 

[giro_mary]

I honestly didn't think of youtube, I'll give us an eye, thank you! :redface:

 

[terri87]

I don't know if you saw this page from the autodesk websitehttps://www.autodesk.it/compare/compare-features/revit-vs-revit-ltthe main difference is definitely the non-possibility to activate the worksets in the lt version, although this depends on the size of the project and the number of employees. then there is the rendering part that is not a thing to underestimate

 

[Tristan]

then there is the rendering part that is not a thing to underestimate

with live revit bypass the problemhttp://www.autodesk.com/products/revit-live/overview