rhinoceros vs autocad

[Il marangon]

Hello

during the holidays I happened to have an intense discussion about the potential of autocad regarding rhinocers.
Leaving part 2d where I believe that autocad is an undisputed master, I had a lot to say about the fre-form part where I was outraged and praised the great and much greater potential of the last autocad relay. Now, I work a lot with rhinoceros and not with autocad (I am still on version 14 I used at school) I ask more experienced users and users of both programs to help me understand if they told me a buffalo or it is true that autocad overtaken rhinocers regarding free form modeling and rendering.

we came to the point of saying that even solid works is less than autocad and that 90% of the world market of cad is covered by autocad... That sounds really big, doesn't it?

greetings and thanks

 

[Onda]

if nothing else for the potential that has rhinoceros to open almost any type of file generated by another cad and to save in a variety of formats, I would say there are no comparisons.
not to mention the price! rhino costs as much as acad lt but is incredibly superior.
I use acad lt for which on modeling in 3d I can tell you little.
I happened to manage with other file programs generated by acad in 3d and I had a lot of problems. rhino is compatible with everything.
I don't know sincerely how much acad's 2010 went on, even to me they said that it improved a lot, but I struggle to think that it came to the flexibility of rhino.

 

[enri]

Just add tspline in rhino and also on the freeform, which according to them is now supported by autocad, but I have serious doubts about its effectiveness, the leap forward is remarkable, and always to a quarter of the price.

 

[marcof]

we came to the point of saying that even solid works is less than autocad

You'll understand... autocad in 3d is an immonda key even if it was the only cad existing in the world, let's compare it with rhino or solidworks
You have to tell the guy you've been discussing changing the dealer before he's insurmountable damage and losing all the raziocinio, who's already at the dumplings... :smile:

Hi.

 

[Il marangon]

You'll understand... autocad in 3d is an immonda key even if it was the only cad existing in the world, let's compare it with rhino or solidworks

Hi.

but that's what I repeated for half an hour. .
the answer was that only a few elect really know how to use the program and that to learn it takes at least a year of course

I almost laughed. . .

 

[ETAOIN SHRDLU]

I leave the comment to my avatar. .

 

[X3D]

always the usual diatriba is better this and better that.

Let us say that to each one his field.

autocad 2010 has taken a huge step forward, but to say that with the addition of autocad sds exceeds rhino in the freeform passes.
with sds you make modeling type 3ds max, maya, xsi, way etc....
At the limit you can export to stl and make a prototype.
and then I go to spend all that money to have sds in autocad, when I can make that kind of free modeling with blender! !
or better as it says enri, I add to rhino t-splines and I have the best in circulation regarding the sds and in addition I can convert them to nurbs what autocad does not and at a price not even half autocad.

to learn autocad it takes a year (even for me it is better that they change the dealers)

soon

x3d

 

[Fulvio Romano]

autocad in 3d is better than rhino....mmmhh
It takes courage to support such a thesis, even having a lot of alcohol in body...
I would say that autocad makes 2d, has a little 3d right for completeness.

 

[Tautor]

... autocad vs rhino in 3d ... but we joke!?!? ... we are serious, we talk about autocad "liscio" ... we make only lines and circles, maybe even the cubes and spheres ... not more ... we leave the modeling 3d freeform serious to other software. autocad "liscio" is good for the 2d, and for this it should be appreciated.
That I'm talking about these experts... :

 

[stef_design]

Hello, little consideration. it does not seem to you that the latest version of autocad 2010 has lost some of its true nature of cad 2d. Now I see the possibility of editing mesh, nurbs and more...a sort you 3d study + maya + rhino. I don't understand why this trend change
in autocad theory is very used in architecture studies, geometries, civilians. but...in a while will also use the disney.:smile:
Hi.

 

[marcof]

Hello, little consideration. it does not seem to you that the latest version of autocad 2010 has lost some of its true nature of cad 2d. Now I see the possibility of editing mesh, nurbs and more...a sort you 3d study + maya + rhino. I don't understand why this trend change:confused

imho is not a trend change, marketing operations are studied to keep the chicken alive from the golden eggs by adding occasionally with the dropper some gadgets and some lustrino.
they have such an exterminate user basin that the chances that in many a subscriber and cry to the miracle (because there are two cross nurbs or can rotate and work on screen a solid 3d in shading) are consistent and equally cocnsistent are therefore contracts for renewing new licenses or licenses, at an obscene price, that for that tyraline is a real unarmed hand robbery.

Hi.